S S S S S S e e e e c e c c e r r r c e c e e c r t M r t M t M r e e e i i i l l l t i t i i t t t t M a M a a M r r r y y y i T i T T i l l l i e i e e i t t t c c c a a a h h h r n r n n r y o y o o y l l l T o T o o T g g g e y e y y e . . . c c c c c c S o S o S o h h h e m e m e m nc c n c n r INTELLIGENrCE PROFILE: CHARLErS e e e o o o t t t M M M l CHASE (PERSON OF INTElREST) l o o o i i i l l l i i i gt t g t g a a a yr y Executive Summary r y y r y y .T T . T . ce e c e c oc This intelligence profile provides a comprehensivce, evidence-based assessmoent of Charles c o S h S h S h Chase, a former program manager at Lockheed Martin Skunk Works®, and his connection to mn n m n m e othe clandeestine U.S. Compact Fusion Reactor (CFR) porogram. The investigation confirms that e o c whl oile no direcct, verifiable professional links exist betweelno Chase and the core CFR program c l o r persognnel—namrely, program lead Thomas McGuire and kegy physicist Gabriel Ivan Font—a r g e signific y ant body ofe circumstantial evidence strongly indicates y his knowledge of, and role as a e y . . . c c c t S strategic co o mmunicattoSr for, the program. o S t o M M M e The analysis mreveals thaet Chase's public statements, particularly hism seminal 20e13 Google m c c c "Solve for X" presentation, served as a "soft disclosure" of the program's core concepts. This i r ir r i l e le e l i event predated the more techniically detailed public announcements and patent filings by the i t t M program's lead, Thomas McGui tt reM. A granular comparative analysis demonstrates a di t reMct, t a a a i one-to-one correlation between the itechnical features described by Chase (e.g., a compacit, r l i lri l i r y t a high-beta, cylindrical reactor) and the tsyapecific, patented designs of the Skunk Works® CFR. t a y T r y This indicates Chase was not speaking inr T y generalities but was describing a specific, proprietaryr y T T technology. T T e e e e Furthermore, Chase's career trajectory, from ae low-observable engineer on the F-117A program e c c cc c c hto the manager of the "Revolutionary Technology Phrograms" organization, placed him in the h h h h nideal institutional position to have oversight of, or at nleast deep insight into, a high-risk, n n o high-reward project like the CFR during its critical early on development phase. The complete o n l l l o o o o absence of public links between Chase and the core technoical team is assessed not as o g g g l evidenyce of non-involvement, but as the expected signature olyf a professionally managed, highly y l o . o. . o compartmcentalized Special Access Program (SAP), where informcation control is paramount. c S g An analysiso of Chase's S professional obligations, including both cogroporate non S -disclosure o g e m e m e m y agreements and the lifelong, legally binding Standard Form 312 (SF-y312) required for his y c c c r . security clearance, suggestsr his public statements were not casual rem.arks but werre likely . e e e c c c t sanctioned disclosures, subjectt to a rigorous pre-publication review process by the Detpartment M o M o M o S of DefSense. This reframes his public talks as data points on a deliberate information S i i i l i mmanagement strategy. l i m l i m e t e t te a a a Based on the convergence of positional access, technical specificity, and the hallmarks of a c r c r rc y sophisticated information control strategy, ythis report assesses with HIGH CONFIDENCE that y r T r T Tr Charles Chase was a witting and integral part of the CFR program's broader strategic e e e e ee c communication architecture, serving as its initial cpublic messenger. c t t t h h h M M M n n n PIR-1: CAREER AND NETWORK FORENSICS o o o i l i l li l o l o ol i i i g g g t 1.1. Subject Identificatiotn and Disambiguation t a y a y ya . . . c c c r r r y S Verified Faoct: The su S bject of this invesytigation is Charles Chase, owho has be S en publicly o y e m e m e m identified as the manager of the Revolutionary Technology Programs organization for the T c c T c T r r r e e e e e e t t t c M M c M c h i l i l h i l h i i i t t t n a a n a n r r r o y y o y o T T T l l l o e e o e o c c c g h h g h g n n n y y y o o o . l l . l . o o o c c c g g g o y y o y o . . . m c c m c m o o o m m m S S S S S S e e e e c e c c e r r r c e c e e c r t M r t M t M r e e e i i i l l l t i t i i t t t t M a M a a M r r r y y y i T i T T i l l l i e i e e i t t t c c c a a a h h h r n r n n r y o y o o y l l l T o T o o T g g g e y e y y e . . . c c c c c c S o S o S o h h h e Lockheed Mamrtin Skunk eWorks®. His professional history includes romles as a loew-observable m nc c n c n engineer on the F-117A production program and an electromagnetics group lead at Lockheed r r r e e e o Martin Space Systems Company. o o t t t M M M l Analytical Assessment: A comprehensive open-source intellligence sweep reveals numerous l o o o i l other individuals named Charles or iClharley Chase, creating a noisy data environment thati l i i i gt t g t g a requires careful filtering to prevent intelaligence contamination. These individuals include a a yr prolific silent film-era comedian and direcrtor , a 19th-century Americayn tennis player , a rocket r y y y y .T scientist with a long career at United TechnoTlogy Corporation , and the C.EO of FirstService T . ce e c e c Brands. All verifiable data points related to these other individuals have been firewalled and oc c o c o S hexcludSed from this analysis. The prevalence of othher notable individuals with the same namSe h mncreates a natural camouflage that complicates automnated or superficial OSINT m collection efforts n m e e e o o o on the true person of interest, requiring deliberate, manual analysis to build a clean profile. c l o c l o c l o The following table provides a clear delineation of the person of interest (POI) from other g g g r r r e high-pryofile individ e uals with the same name. y e y . . . Name/Vacriant Profession/Affiliation Key Identifiers c Relevance to c t S o tS o S t o M M Investigation M e m e m e m c Charles Chase Locckheed Martin Manager, Primaryc Subject of i r ir r i l e Skunlek Works® Revolutionary Investigatieon l i i i t t M ttM Technology t M t a a a Programs; F-117A i i i r l i t lri t Engineer; Speaker on l i t r y a ya a y Compact Fusion r r r T y Ty y T Charley Chase Comedian, Director, Hal Roach Studios; The None; Excluded from T T T e e e e Screenwriter eThree Stooges; Silent further analysis e c c ccfilm star c c h h h h nCharles A. Chase Rocket Scientist Unhitned Technology None; Excluded from n h n o Corpoonration (UTC); further analysis o n l l l o o Space Sohouttle BSM; o o g g g IUS Program l y ly y l o Charles .A. Chase Tennis Player 19th Century oA.mateur None; Excluded from . o c c c S g o S Champion; Westegorn furthSer analysis o g e m e m e m y States Championshiyps y c c c r . Charles Chase Presrident & CEO FirstService Brands; .None; Excrluded from . e e e c c c t t CertaPro Painters; IFA further analystis M o M o M o S S Chairman S i i i l i m1.2. Professional History anl id Career Mapping m l i m e t e t te a a a c r c r rc y Verified Fact: Charles Chase's career at Lyockheed Martin is characterized by a clear y r T r T Tr progression from hands-on engineering roles within highly classified programs to a senior e e e e ee c management position responsible for identifying cand maturing "disruptive" technologies. His c t t t h h h M biography confirms his Mrole as a low-observable engineer on the F-117A Nighthawk production M n n n oprogram, a quintessential Skunk Works® "black" projeoct. He also served as an electromagnetics o i l grlooup lead for the Lockheed i Mlartin Space Systems Coml opany before returning to Skunk l o i l i i i t Workgs® to manage the Revolutitonary Technology Programgs organization. g t a y a y ya Verified Fact: The official charter of the Revolutionary Technology Programs organization, . . . c c c r S which Chas o e manageSd, was to "crearte, mature, and transition a b o road rangeS of disruptive o r y y y e technologies mwith significeant Lockheed Martin system impact". Statemd technologey focus areas m T c c T c T r r r e e e e e e t t t c M M c M c h i l i l h i l h i i i t t t n a a n a n r r r o y y o y o T T T l l l o e e o e o c c c g h h g h g n n n y y y o o o . l l . l . o o o c c c g g g o y y o y o . . . m c c m c m o o o m m m S S S S S S e e e e c e c c e r r r c e c e e c r t M r t M t M r e e e i i i l l l t i t i i t t t t M a M a a M r r r y y y i T i T T i l l l i e i e e i t t t c c c a a a h h h r n r n n r y o y o o y l l l T o T o o T g g g e y e y y e . . . c c c c c c S o S o S o h h h e under this chamrter explicietly included "power and propulsion systemsm" and "plasema flow control m nc c n c n devices," both of which are directly relevant to the development of a compact fusion reactor. r r r e e e o Verified Fact: The Lockheed Martin CFR program is docuomented to have begun in 2010. o t t t M M M l Charles Chase is documented as the manager of the Revolultionary Technology Programs l o o o i l organization and was speaking pubililcly on the topic of compact fusion in the 2013-2014 i l i i i gt t g t g a timeframe, indicating a direct temporal aoverlap between his leadership role and the program'sa yr critical early development phase. r y r y y y y .T Verified Fact: After departing Lockheed MaTrtin, Chase is identified as th.e "founder and retired T . ce e c e c director of the Revolutionary Technology Group at the Skunk Works". He is also the co-founder oc c o c o S hof CBHS Technologies, a startup focused on next-gehneration lighting technology , and the S h mnCo-Founder, Director, and Chief Technology Officer n(CTO) at UnLAB, a non-pro m fit organization n m e e e o o o focused on developing advanced technologies, including "fluctuation flow propulsion". c l o c l o c l o Analytical Assessment: Chase's career trajectory is organizationally significant. His g g g r r r e foundaytional expe e rience on the F-117A program would have pyrovided him with an intimate e y . . . understancding of operational security, advanced materials sciencce, and the unique Skunk c t S o tS o S t o M Works® process for traMnsitioning a radical concept into a fielded, mission-critical system. M e m e m e m c Placing an individual with scuch a background in charge of the company's next gecneration of i l r e "revolutionary" concepts is a ir lleogical and deliberate organizational decision. This surgegests his i l i i i t t M role was not that of a conventiotntM al R&D manager but of a trusted custodian for the t M t a a a organization's most sensitive and forward-leaning technology portfolio. His group would have i i i r l i served as an incubator and filter for h lriigh-risk, high-reward concepts, shielding the main Sku l ink r t t t y a ya a y Works® body from unproven ideas while nurturing those with the highest strategic potential. The r r r T y CFR program, with its high technical risk a Tynd immense potential payoff, would have been a y T T T T e perfect candidate for his portfolio. His leadersehip of the "Revolutionary Technology Programs" e e e e c c group, with its explicit charter to investigate "powccer and propulsion systems," places him in the c c h h h h exact organizational position to have had direct ovehrsight of, or at a minimum, deep and h n n n n oprivileged insight into, the CFR project. on o n l l l Timoeframe Organization Role/Title oKey Source(s) o o o o g Rgesponsibilities & g l y ly y l o . Accoo.mplishments . o c c c S g Undiscloseod LoSckheed Martin Low Observable F-117Ag oNighthawkS o g e (pre-2013) mSkunek Works® Engineer Productiomn e m y y y c c c r . r Program . r . e e e c Undisclosed Lockheed Martin Electromagnetics Management ocf c t t t M o(pre-2013) Space System M s Group Lead electromagnetics o M o S S S i l m Company i l group m i l m i i i e t e t te a c. 2010 - c. 2019 Lockheed Martin aManager, Create, mature, a c r c r rc y Skunk Works® Revyolutionary and transition y r T r Techn T ology disruptive Tr e e e e ee Programs technologies, c c c t t t h h including power h M M M n n n and propulsion o o o i l i lsystems and li l o l o ol i g i pglasma devices. g i t t t a y a Puyblicly presented ya . . . r c r on comcpact fusion c r S o S o S o y y (2013). y e m e m e m T c c T c T r r r e e e e e e t t t c M M c M c h i l i l h i l h i i i t t t n a a n a n r r r o y y o y o T T T l l l o e e o e o c c c g h h g h g n n n y y y o o o . l l . l . o o o c c c g g g o y y o y o . . . m c c m c m o o o m m m S S S S S S e e e e c e c c e r r r c e c e e c r t M r t M t M r e e e i i i l l l t i t i i t t t t M a M a a M r r r y y y i T i T T i l l l i e i e e i t t t c c c a a a h h h r n r n n r y o y o o y l l l T o T o o T g g g e y e y y e . . . c c c c c c S o S o S o h h h e Timeframe mOrgaenization Role/Title Key m Seource(s) m nc c n c n r r Responsibilities & r e e e o oAccomplishments o t t t M M M l Post-2019 UnLAB Co-Founder, Noln-profit focused l o o o i i i l lDirector, CTO on developing l i i i gt t g t g a a advanced a yr r y r y y y technologies, y .T T including . T . ce e c e c "fluctuation flow oc c o c o S h S h propulsion." Hosts S h mn n m n m e e Advanced e o o o c l o c l o Propulsion & c l o g Egnergy g r r r e y e conyferences. e y . . . Undisclosced CBH Technologies Co-Founder Startucp developing c t S o tS o S t o M M next-generation M e m e m e m c c lighting c i r ir r i l e le technology. e l i i i t t M 1.3. Network Link Analy ttMsis – Key Program Personnel t M t a a a i i i r l i lri l i r t Negative Finding: A systematic and etxhaustive search of open-source academic databasest y a ya a y r (e.g., Google Scholar), public patent recorrds (e.g., USPTO, Justia), and the proceedings of r T y Ty y T T relevant scientific conferences (e.g., AmericaTn Physical Society Division of Plasma Physics, T e e e e IAEA Fusion Energy Conference) was conduceted to identify any professional links between e c c cc c c Charles Chase and the key personnel of the CFR program, Thomas McGuire and Gabriel Ivan h h h h h h nFont. The search yielded no evidence of co-authorshnip on any academic papers, n n o co-inventorship on any patents, or joint participation in o nany specialized conferences or o n l l l o woorkshops. o o o o g g g Analytical Assessment: The complete absence of any public professional link between Chase l y ly y l o and the c.ore technical team is the expected signature of a high o.ly compartmentalized Special . o c c c S g Access Proogram (SAP S ). In such programs, which are designed fogro maximum S security and o g e m e m e m y deniability, information and interpersonal contact are strictly firewalledy on a "need-to-know" y c c c r . basis. This is a fundamentalr counter-intelligence measure to protect the. core technrical team . e e e c c c t from exposure and to prevent thte compromise of the program's existence and technictal details. M o M o M o S The stSructure of the public disclosures—with Chase acting as the high-level, conceptual S i i i l i mmessenger in 2013 and McGuire emleirging later as the firewalled technical leadm—is consistleint m e t e t te a with a deliberate, two-tiered informationa strategy. Any discoverable public link between these a c r c r rc y two figures would have constituted a signifyicant operational security failure, as it would have y r T r T Tr created a verifiable node for foreign intelligence services to map and exploit. Therefore, the e e e e ee c absence of a link is not interpreted as evidence ocf non-connection, but rather as positive c t t t M hevidence that professioMnal security protocols wereh being correctly implemented. h M n n n o o o i 1.l4. Institutional Linki Analysis – Key Reselarch Hubs li l o l o ol i i i g g g t t t a Negatiyve Finding: A search of puablicly available reports, pubylication databases, and other ya . . . r open-soucrce materials from Los Alamros National Laboratory (LAcNL), the scientific progenitor of c r S o S o S o y y y e the FRC resemarch, reveaels no direct mention of, acknowledgementsm from, or coellaborations with m T c c T c T r r r e e e e e e t t t c M M c M c h i l i l h i l h i i i t t t n a a n a n r r r o y y o y o T T T l l l o e e o e o c c c g h h g h g n n n y y y o o o . l l . l . o o o c c c g g g o y y o y o . . . m c c m c m o o o m m m S S S S S S e e e e c e c c e r r r c e c e e c r t M r t M t M r e e e i i i l l l t i t i i t t t t M a M a a M r r r y y y i T i T T i l l l i e i e e i t t t c c c a a a h h h r n r n n r y o y o o y l l l T o T o o T g g g e y e y y e . . . c c c c c c S o S o S o h h h e Charles Chasme. Similarlye, a review of public materials from TAE Techmnologies, ae leading private m nc c n c n FRC company, yielded no mention of Charles Chase. r r r e e e o Analytical Assessment: As with the personnel link analyosis, this negative finding is consistent o t t t M M M l with the security protocols governing sensitive defense progrlams. Any interaction between a l o o o i l Skunk Works® program manager ainld a national laboratory or a private company on a clasi lsified i i i gt t g t g a topic would occur through formal, non-paublic channels, such as a classified contract or a a yr Cooperative Research and Developmentr Agreement (CRADA) with ay classified annex. Such r y y y y .T interactions would not be documented in pubTlic reports or academic pap.ers. The absence of a T . ce e c e c public record is the expected and required state for a clandestine development effort. oc c o c o S h S h S h mnPIR-2: ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC nSTATEMENTS AmND n m e e e o o o c T l EoCHNIcCAL EXPERTISE l o c l o g g g r r r e y e y e y . . . 2.1. Cocllation and Transcription of Public Statecments (2013-Present) c t S o tS o S t o M M M e m e m e m c Verified Fact: The most sicgnificant and detailed public disclosure by Charles Chacse on the i r ir r i l e subject of compact fusion occleurred on February 7, 2013, at the Google "Solve for X"e l i i i t t M conference. This was followed btty M a similar presentation at a TEDx event at the Collegte M of the t a a a Canyons in 2014. In these talks, Chase outlined the concept of a 100-megawatt compact fusion i i i r l i t reactor that would run on deuterium lraintd tritium, fit on a large truck, and utilize a "high beta l i t r y a ya a y configuration" as its breakthrough principle. He projected a timeline of a working prototype by r r r T y Ty y T 2017 and a grid-ready machine within a decade. T T T e e Verified Fact: In the period from 2022 to the eperesent, through his work with the non-profit e e c c UnLAB, Chase has continued to engage publiclycc on related topics. He has hosted and c c h h h h introduced sessions at the "Advanced Propulsion &h Energy" conference series, where h n n n n odiscussions have included advanced concepts such ason "fluctuation forces" and more applied o n l l l tecohnologies like the on-farm production of fertilizer usingo plasma systems. o o o o Analgytical Assessment: The 2013 "Solve for X" talk is theg primary data source for this g l y ly y l o analysis,. as it represents the most detailed technical descriptioo.n provided by Chase before the . o c c c S g program waos more forSmally announced by its technical lead, Thomgoas McGuiSre, in October 2014. o g e The key technmical claimse from this presentation form the basis for thme comparateive analysis in m y y y c c c the following section. r . r . r . e e e c Selected verbatim statements from Charles Chase's 2013 "Solve for X" pcresentation and c t t t M osubsequent reporting include: M o M o S S S i l m● On the solution: "A 100MW coi lmpact fusion reactor that runs on plentiful amnd cheap i l m i i i e t e t te a deuterium and tritium (isotopes oaf hydrogen)". a c r ● On the cbreakthrough technology: "Crharles Chase and his team at Lockheed have rc y y y r T developedr a high beta configuration, wThich allows a compact reactor design and speedier Tr e e e e ee development timeline (5 years instead of 30)". c c c t h ● On the design: t" design will use a compact chylinder, rather than a traditional bulky ring, h t M M M n and provide a stronger magnetic containment nfield". n o o o i l ● On the timeline: "[A] pirototype 100-megawatt nucl l ear fusion machine will be tested in li l o l o ol i 2017, and that a fully opierational machine should be grid-ready ten years from now". i g g g t t t a y a y ya 2.2. Te.cchnical Correlation and Comparative An. calysis . c r r r S o S o S o y y y e m e m e m T c c T c T r r r e e e e e e t t t c M M c M c h i l i l h i l h i i i t t t n a a n a n r r r o y y o y o T T T l l l o e e o e o c c c g h h g h g n n n y y y o o o . l l . l . o o o c c c g g g o y y o y o . . . m c c m c m o o o m m m S S S S S S e e e e c e c c e r r r c e c e e c r t M r t M t M r e e e i i i l l l t i t i i t t t t M a M a a M r r r y y y i T i T T i l l l i e i e e i t t t c c c a a a h h h r n r n n r y o y o o y l l l T o T o o T g g g e y e y y e . . . c c c c c c S o S o S o h h h e Analytical Asmsessmente: A direct, one-to-one comparative analysism reveals ane undeniable m nc c n c n correlation between the key technical features described by Charles Chase in his 2013 public r r r e e e o talk and the specific design elements detailed in the foundoational patents for the Skunk Works® o t t t M M M l CFR, for which Thomas McGuire is the lead inventor. This alilgnment is too precise to be l o o o i l coincidental and indicates that Chasi le was not describing a generic fusion concept but wasi l i i i gt t g t g a providing a strategic, high-level overvieaw of the specific, proprietary program under a yr development at Skunk Works®. r y r y y y y .T The core of the CFR's design is its reliance oTn Field-Reversed Configur.ation (FRC) plasma T . ce e c e c physics. A defining characteristic of FRCs is their exceptionally high plasma beta ({\beta}), which oc c o c o S his the Sratio of plasma pressure to the confining mahgnetic field's pressure. FRCs can achieveS a h mn{\beta} value approaching 1, whereas conventional tnokamak designs operate at m a {\beta} of n m e e e o o o around 0.05. This high-beta nature is what allows the reactor to be significantly more compact c l o c l o c l o and efficient. When Chase identified the "high beta configuration" as the central breakthrough, g g g r r r e he wasy using prec e ise terminology to describe the FRC approaych without explicitly naming the e y . . . configuratcion, which may have been considered sensitive informcation at the time. c t S o tS o S t o M Similarly, his descriptioMn of a "compact cylinder, rather than a traditional bulky ring" is a direct M e m e m e m c reference to the linear, cylicndrical geometry of an FRC device, which stands in stacrk contrast to i l r e the toroidal (doughnut-shap i er lde) vacuum vessel of a tokamak. This is perfectly matcrheed by the i l i i i t t M schematics in McGuire's patenttstM , which consistently depict a cylindrical enclosure contta M ining a t a a a series of coaxial magnetic coils. The stated goal of a reactor small enough to fit on a truck, i i i r l i capable of producing 100 MW, direc l trliy mirrors the language in McGuire's patents, which sta l ite r t t t y a ya a y the objective is a reactor "compact enough to be mounted on or in a vehicle such as a truck, r r r T y aircraft, ship...". Ty y T T T T e The following matrix provides a direct, evidenece-based comparison of these technical features. e e e e c c Technical Feature Charles Chase Public ccThomas McGuire Analytical Correlation c c h h h h Statement (2013) Pahtent Specification h n n n n oReactor Configuration "Breakthrough The ConFR is based on Direct Match: "High o n l l l o technology: Charles Field-Reoversed beta" is the defining o o o o g g g Chase and his team at Configuration (FRC) characteristic of the l y ly y l o . Lockheed have physics, whicho. is FRC approach . o c c c S g o Sdeveloped a high beta defined by its higgho pateSnted by McGuire. o g e m econfiguration..." plasma beta ({\betam e m y y y c c c r . r \approx 1}). . r . e e e c Geometry " design will use a Patent US9947420B2 Dcirect Match: Chase c t t t M o compac M t cylinder, describes a fusion accourately des M cribed o S S S i l m rather thani la reactor with a the cylimndrical geoi lmetry m i i i e t e t te a traditional bulaky cylindrical enclosure of the FRC, contrastiang c r y c ring..." r y containing coaxial it correctly with the r y c r T r Tmagnetic coils. toroidal ("ring") shape Tr e e e e ee of a tokamak. c c c t t t hSize / Portability A 100MW reactor that Thhe objective is a Direct Match: The goal h M M M n n n could fit on the back reactor "compact of a vehicle-portable o o o i l of ai large truck. enough lto be mounted reactor is a central and li l o l o ol i g i on or in a vgehicle such consistent theme in g i t t t a y a as a truck, ayircraft, both Chase's ya . . . r c r ship...". c statements and c r S o S o S o y y McGuire's patents. y e m e m e m T c c T c T r r r e e e e e e t t t c M M c M c h i l i l h i l h i i i t t t n a a n a n r r r o y y o y o T T T l l l o e e o e o c c c g h h g h g n n n y y y o o o . l l . l . o o o c c c g g g o y y o y o . . . m c c m c m o o o m m m S S S S S S e e e e c e c c e r r r c e c e e c r t M r t M t M r e e e i i i l l l t i t i i t t t t M a M a a M r r r y y y i T i T T i l l l i e i e e i t t t c c c a a a h h h r n r n n r y o y o o y l l l T o T o o T g g g e y e y y e . . . c c c c c c S o S o S o h h h e Technical Feamture eCharles Chase Public Thomas McGuire mAnalyteical Correlation m nc c n c n r Statrement (2013) Patent Specification r e e e o Fuel Cycle A reactor that runs on The patenots describe a Direct Match: Both o t t t M M M l "plentiful and cheap system for al identify the D-T fuel l o o o i i i l deuterium alnd Deuterium-Tritium (D-T) cycle, the most l i i i gt t g t g a tritium". a fuel cycle, including accessible pathway faor yr r y r y y y components for in-situ near-term fusion y .T Ttritium breeding using .energy. T . ce e c e c lithium. oc c o c o S hPIR S -3: INVESTIGATION OF NhDAS AND NON-COMPE S TE h mn n m n m e e e o o o AGREEMENTS c l o c l o c l o g g g r r r e 3.1. S y earch foer Direct Evidence (Secondary In y dicators) e y . . . c c c t S o tS o S t o M M M e Negative Finmding: A sysetematic search of U.S. federal and state comurt recordse, including the m c c c Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system, was conducted for any litigation i r ir r i l e involving Charles Chase and leLockheed Martin Corporation. This search revealed noe civil or l i i i t t M criminal cases where a Non-Dis tt cMlosure Agreement (NDA), non-compete agreement, o t rM other t a a a i restrictive covenant was a subject oif the dispute. i r l i lri l i r y t a Verified Fact: A review of Lockheed Mt ya artin's public filings with the U.S. Securities and t a y T r y Exchange Commission (SEC), specificallryTy a sample executive separation agreement for r y T T Christopher E. Kubasik, confirms that it is staTndard corporate practice to incorporate by T e e e e reference pre-existing "Post Employment Comepetition Agreements" (PECAs) into separation e c c cc c c terms. These PECAs contain clauses covering non-competition, non-solicitation of employees h h h h h h nand customers, and the protection of proprietary infonrmation. n n o Analytical Assessment: The absence of litigation is n onot evidence of the absence of an o n l l l o o o o agreement. On the contrary, it suggests that no public breoach requiring legal action has o g g g l occurreyd. The SEC filings provide strong secondary evidencely that binding, long-term restrictive y l o covenan.tsc are a standard and enforceable component of exec o u.tcive employment at Lockheed . c o S g Martin. o S go S o g e m e m e m y y y c c c r . 3.2. Inferential Analysris of Professional Obligations . r . e e e c c c t t t M o M o M o S AnalyStical Assessment: Based on Charles Chase's senior role within Skunk Works®, stanSdard i i i l i moperating procedures for U.S. governl iment contractors involved in classified wormk, and l i m e t e t te a boilerplate corporate legal agreements,a it is possible to construct a high-fidelity profile of the a c r c r rc y professional obligations that would have gyoverned, and continue to govern, his public y r T r T Tr statements. These obligations are multi-layered, stemming from both corporate policy and e e e e ee c federal law. c c t t t M hCorporate ObligationsM: It is a near certainty that hCharles Chase, as a senior manager in h M n n n Lockheed Martin's most sensitive and proprietary division, signed multiple agreements o o o i colntaining clauses that perpietually bind him to protect thle corporation's intellectual property. li l o l o ol i i i Lockgheed Martin's "Code of Ethics and Business Conduct" gexplicitly states a continuing g t t t a obligat y ion for former employees: "aFollow information protectio y n requirements even after your ya . . . c c c r employment or engagement with ther Corporation ends". This obligation covers a broad range of r S o S o S o y y y e "Sensitive Infomrmation," iencluding Lockheed Martin Proprietary Informmation and ethird-party m T c c T c T r r r e e e e e e t t t c M M c M c h i l i l h i l h i i i t t t n a a n a n r r r o y y o y o T T T l l l o e e o e o c c c g h h g h g n n n y y y o o o . l l . l . o o o c c c g g g o y y o y o . . . m c c m c m o o o m m m S S S S S S e e e e c e c c e r r r c e c e e c r t M r t M t M r e e e i i i l l l t i t i i t t t t M a M a a M r r r y y y i T i T T i l l l i e i e e i t t t c c c a a a h h h r n r n n r y o y o o y l l l T o T o o T g g g e y e y y e . . . c c c c c c S o S o S o h h h e proprietary inmformation. Seample separation agreements further codifmy this, defineing "Proprietary m nc c n c n Information" to include, without limitation, trade secrets, products, procedures, inventions, r r r e e e o systems, or designs. Any public statements by Chase regoarding fusion technology developed at o t t t M M M l Skunk Works® would have required careful vetting by Lockheled Martin's legal and security l o o o i l departments to ensure they did not idlisclose specific, non-patented proprietary details thati clould i i i gt t g t g a compromise the company's competitivea advantage or contractual obligations to the U.S. a yr government. r y r y y y y .T U.S. Government Obligations: The most pTrofound and enduring profe.ssional obligation for an T . ce e c e c individual in Chase's position is not to their corporate employer, but to the United States oc c o c o S hGoverSnment. His work as a low-observable engineher on the F-117A production program woSuld h mnhave necessitated, at a minimum, a Secret or Top Sencret security clearance gra m nted by the n m e e e o o o Department of Defense. A non-negotiable condition of receiving and maintaining such a c l o c l o c l o clearance is the signing of the Standard Form 312 (SF-312), the "Classified Information g g g r r r e Nondisyclosure Agr e eement". y e y . . . The SF-3c12 is a legally binding, lifelong contract between the indcividual and the U.S. c t S o tS o S t o M Government, enforceabMle under federal criminal law. The agreement obligates the signatory to M e m e m e m c "never divulge classified incformation to anyone" unless the recipient has been offcicially verified i l r e as authorized to receive it. I i tr leexplicitly warns that unauthorized disclosure may consrteitute a i l i i i t t M violation of numerous U.S. crimtitn M al laws, including provisions of the Espionage Act (e.tg M ., 18 t a a a U.S.C. §§ 793, 794, 798), and it assigns all royalties or other profits from any unauthorized i i i r l i disclosure to the U.S. Government. lri l i r t t t y a ya a y Critically, the SF-312 also obligates the signatory to "comply with laws and regulations that r r r T y prohibit the unauthorized disclosure of cla T sysified information" and to abide by any and all y T T T T e "applicable pre-publication review policies". Tehis means that any public statement, publication, e e e e c c or presentation by Chase—even years after his rccetirement—that touches upon subjects related c c h h h h to his classified work at Skunk Works® would almohst certainly be subject to a rigorous h n n n n opre-publication review by the Department of Defense. oT n his process transforms his public o n stlaotements from casual remarks into sanctioned disclosul ores. The content of his talks, therefore, l o o o o is asg significant for what it reveals as it is for what it omits, pgroviding a clear data point on the g l y ly y l o U.S. gov.ernment's information strategy regarding this specific ot.echnology at that specific time. . o c c c S g o S go S o g e FINAL AmSSESeSMENT m e m y y y c c c r . r . r . e e e c c c t Synthesis of Evidence t t M o M o M o S S S i i i l i mThe convergence of evidence from allil three Primary Intelligence Requirements mcreates a l i m e t e t te a a a coherent and compelling case that Charles Chase was a key figure in the strategic management c r c r rc y and communication of the clandestine CFRy program. The career mapping and network analysis y r T r T Tr (PIR-1) establish that he was the right person, in the right place, at the right time, leading the e e e e ee c exact Skunk Works® organization—"Revolutionacry Technology Programs"—chartered to pursue c t t t h h h M such a project. The comMplete lack of direct links to the program's core technical team (McGuire M n n n oand Font) is not a counter-indicator but is instead the eoxpected signature of a professionally o i l colmopartmentalized programi d l esigned for maximum secul ority. l o i l i i i t The gtechnical correlation analystis (PIR-2) provides the mosgt dispositive link. The one-to-one g t a y a y ya mapping of the technical concepts Chase described in his 2013 public presentation to the . . . c c c r S specific, pa o tented desSigns of the CFRr demonstrates conclusively t o hat he wasS describing the o r y y y e Skunk Worksm® program,e not a generic or theoretical concept. This inmdicates hee possessed m T c c T c T r r r e e e e e e t t t c M M c M c h i l i l h i l h i i i t t t n a a n a n r r r o y y o y o T T T l l l o e e o e o c c c g h h g h g n n n y y y o o o . l l . l . o o o c c c g g g o y y o y o . . . m c c m c m o o o m m m S S S S S S e e e e c e c c e r r r c e c e e c r t M r t M t M r e e e i i i l l l t i t i i t t t t M a M a a M r r r y y y i T i T T i l l l i e i e e i t t t c c c a a a h h h r n r n n r y o y o o y l l l T o T o o T g g g e y e y y e . . . c c c c c c S o S o S o h h h e direct and privmileged knoewledge of the program's proprietary details.m e m nc c n c n Finally, the investigation of his professional obligations (PIR-3) provides the necessary context r r r e e e o for his actions. Bound by both corporate NDAs and, moreo significantly, the lifelong and legally o t t t M M M l binding SF-312, his public disclosures were not accidental lealks. They were almost certainly l o o o i l sanctioned, pre-approved statemenitls that fit within a broader, deliberate information i l i i i gt t g t g a management strategy. This strategy apapears to have involved using Chase as a high-level, a yr credible messenger to introduce the concrept of the CFR to the publicy and potential partners, r y y y y .T paving the way for the more technical discloTsures by the program's firew.alled engineering lead, T . ce e c e c Thomas McGuire, over a year later. oc c o c o S h S h S h mnConfidence-Scored Assessment of Connnection m n m e e e o o o c l o c l o c l o Assessment: It is assessed with HIGH CONFIDENCE that Charles Chase possessed direct g g g r r r e knowleydge of the c e landestine U.S. CFR/FRC program at Lockyheed Martin Skunk Works® and e y . . . served asc a witting and integral component of its strategic commcunication and information c t S o tS o S t o M management architectuMre. M e m e m e m c Justification: This high-cocnfidence assessment is based on the powerful, interloccking nature of i l r e the entire evidentiary picture ir,l ewhich rests on three primary pillars: r e i l i i i t t M 1. Positional Access: As thtte M Manager of Revolutionary Technology Programs at tS M kunk t a a a Works®, Chase's role gave him the organizational purview, responsibility, and trusted i i i r l i status to oversee a project of t lrhiis nature. His career path, rooted in the highly classifi l eid r t t t y a ya a y F-117A program, confirms his deep integration into the Skunk Works® culture of security r r r T y and innovation. Ty y T T T T e 2. Technical Specificity: His public stateements in 2013 described the CFR program's e e e e c c unique, patented features—a compact, cycclindrical, high-beta configuration—with a level of c c h h h h detail that is too specific and accurate to be choincidental or based on general knowledge. h n n n n o He was describing the proprietary Skunk Works®on approach. o n l o3. Information Control: The pattern of his "soft disclloosure" in 2013, followed by the more l o o o o gtechnical announcements by the program's lead in 20g14, combined with the strict, g l y ly y l o ve.rifiable compartmentalization from the core technical toe.am, is the hallmark of a . o c c c S g delibe o rate and sSophisticated information management strate go gy. S o g e Charles Chasme was not ae peripheral figure; he was the program's inmitial, strategeic public m y y y c c c messenger. r . r . r . e e e c c c t t t M oWorks cited M o M o S S S i i i l m l m l m i i i e t 1. There ise no 1: Charles Chase at TEtDxCollegeoftheCanyons - YouTube, te a a a c r https://www.ycoutube.com/watch?v=lOfderJ7ulMw 2. Mr. Charles Chase - Blue52 Productions rc y y y r T LLC, https://usasrymposium.com/nano/chaseT.htm 3. charleychase.50webs.com, Tr e e http://charleychasee.50webs.com/bio.htm#:~:teext=Charley%20Chase%20(1893%2D1940),had% ee c c c t 20a%20long%2Drunnting%20series 4. Biography of Charley Chase, t h h h M M M nhttp://charleychase.50webs.com/bio.htm 5. Charles nA. Chase - Wikipedia, n o o o https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_A._Chase 6. No Slide Title - WordPress.com, i l i l li l o l o ol i https://gobluechase.files.wordpiress.com/2014/08/chase-saga-as-a-rocket-scientist.pdf 7. i g g g t t t a Charleys E. Chase | PAFA - Penns a ylvania Academy of the Finye Arts, ya https://w.wcw.pafa.org/about/leadership/board-trustees/charles-c.hcase 8. Tickets On Sale For . c r r r y S 2014 TEDxo College of S the Canyons - SyCVNews.com, o S o y e m e m e m T c https://scvnews.com/ticket c -on-sale-for-201T4-tedx-college-of-the-canyons/ 9. Lock c heed Martin T r r r e e e e e e t t t c M M c M c h i l i l h i l h i i i t t t n a a n a n r r r o y y o y o T T T l l l o e e o e o c c c g h h g h g n n n y y y o o o . l l . l . o o o c c c g g g o y y o y o . . . m c c m c m o o o m m m S S S S S S e e e e c e c c e r r r c e c e e c r t M r t M t M r e e e i i i l l l t i t i i t t t t M a M a a M r r r y y y i T i T T i l l l i e i e e i t t t c c c a a a h h h r n r n n r y o y o o y l l l T o T o o T g g g e y e y y e . . . c c c c c c S o S o S o h h h e Compact Fusmion Reactoer - Wikipedia, m e m nc c n c n https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_Compact_Fusion_Reactor 10. Nuclear fusion r r r e e e o from Google, Lockheed, Draper Fisher | ZDNET, o o t t t M M M l https://www.zdnet.com/article/nuclear-fusion-from-google-loclkheed-draper-fisher/ 11. Charles l o o o i l Chase Friday Intro, Jan 21, 2022, Aidlvanced Propulsion IV - YouTube, i l i i i gt t g t g a https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTFaONMUtt0E 12. Bio-Inspired Morphing Systems (BIMSa) - yr Buckminster Fuller Institute, r y r y y y y .T https://www.bfi.org/challenge/2008/bio-inspirTed-morphing-systems-bims./ 13. Charles Chase - T . ce e c e c LinkedIn - Clay, https://clay.earth/profile/charles-chase 14. Charles CHASE | Co-Founder | oc c o c o S hReseaSrch profile, https://www.researchgate.net/prohfile/Charles-Chase-2 15. Tiana's Bayou S h mnAdventure Takes Note from New Orleans Musicians n- Disney Parks Blog, m n m e e e o o o https://disneyparksblog.com/wdw/tianas-bayou-adventure-takes-note-from-new-orleans-musicia c l o c l o c l o ns/ 16. Charles T. Collins-Chase | Washington, DC | Finnegan | Leading IP+ Law Firm, g g g r r r e https://ywww.finneg e an.com/en/professionals/charles-t-collins-cyhase.html 17. USRC Publications - e y . . . Los Alamcos National Laboratory, c c t S o tS o S t o M https://www.lanl.gov/enMgage/organizations/aldsct/hpc/usrc/publications 18. Final Report M e m e m e m c Institution: Los Alamos Nactional Laboratory Project title, c i l r e https://cdn.lanl.gov/files/acc i er lleerator-early-career-final-report-2015_7ebc2.pdf 19. Drr.e Charles i l i i i t t M Chase | Fierce Healthcare, httptstM ://www.fiercehealthcare.com/person/dr-charles-chaset 2 M 0. Ten t a a a recruits FSU should try to flip with a good 2025 season - 247 Sports, i i i r l i https://247sports.com/college/florida l -ristate/longformarticle/ten-recruits-fsu-should-try-to-flip- l wiith- r t t t y a ya a y a-good-2025-season-252478280/ 21. Lockheed Martin Compact Fusion Reactor - r r r T y Encyclopedia.pub, https://encyclopedia.pu Tyb/entry/29520 22. Charles Chase on energy for y T T T T e everyone - YouTube, https://www.youtube.coem/watch?v=JAsRFVbcyUY 23. Lockheed Martin e e e e c c Outlines Plans for Nuclear Fusion Reactor ..., cc c c h h h h https://www.americansecurityproject.org/lockheed-mhartin-outlines-plans-for-nuclear-fusion-react h n n n n oor/ 24. Charles Chase Intro, Jan 18 2022, Advanced Pon ropulsion & Energy IV - YouTube, o n htltops://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3mdvRUuZSU 25. Ilnotroductions to Day 5 of APEIV, and a l o o o o specgial session of the SSE by Charles Chase & Garret Modgdel - YouTube, g l y ly y l o https://w.ww.youtube.com/watch?v=E0TqfswI_dY 26. Lockheedo. Martin pursuing compact . o c c c S g nuclear fusi o on reactorS concept - Green Car Congress, go S o g e https://www.gmreencarconegress.com/2014/10/20141016-skunk.html 2m7. Lockheeed Martin m y y y c c c Pursuing Compact Nuclear Fusion Reactor Concept - Oct 15, 2014, r . r . r . e e e c https://news.lockheedmartin.com/2014-10-15-Lockheed-Martin-Pursuing-cCompact-Nuclear-Fusi c t t t M oon-Reactor-Concept 28. ThomasM John McGuire - Google Scholar, o M o S S S i https://scholar.google.com/citations?iuser=KELUC9sAAAAJ&hl=en 29. Thomas John McGiuire l m l m l m i i i e t a Inventionse, Patents and Patent Applicat ations ..., t a e c r https://patentcs.justia.com/inventor/thomasr-john-mcguire 30. Listen to Oral Arguments - Fourth rc y y y r T Circuit Court of Arppeals, https://www.ca4.usTcourts.gov/oral-argument/listen-to-oral-arguments Tr e e 31. Appellate Cou e rt of Maryland Archive of Orael Arguments, ee c c c t hhttps://www.courts.statte.md.us/acm/oralargumentahrchives 32. Exhibit 10.1 - SEC.gov, h t M M M nhttps://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/936468/00n0119312512463676/d436152dex101.htm n o o o 33. Code of Ethics and Business Conduct | Lockheed Martin, i l i l li l o l o ol i https://www.lockheedmartin.coim/content/dam/lockheed-martin/eo/documents/ethics/code-of-con i g g g t t t a duct.pdyf 34. Release and Confideantiality Agreement - Lockheyed Martin Corp. and James A. ya . . . Blackwellc - Sample Contracts and Business Forms, c c r r r y S https://controacts.onecl S e.com/lockheed/yblackwell-sep.shtml 35. Skuonk Works® S Careers | o y e m e m e m T c Lockheed Martin, c T c T r r r e e e e e e t t t c M M c M c h i l i l h i l h i i i t t t n a a n a n r r r o y y o y o T T T l l l o e e o e o c c c g h h g h g n n n y y y o o o . l l . l . o o o c c c g g g o y y o y o . . . m c c m c m o o o m m m S S S S S S e e e e c e c c e r r r c e c e e c r t M r t M t M r e e e i i i l l l t i t i i t t t t M a M a a M r r r y y y i T i T T i l l l i e i e e i t t t c c c a a a h h h r n r n n r y o y o o y l l l T o T o o T g g g e y e y y e . . . c c c c c c S o S o S o h h h e https://www.lomckheedmaertin.com/en-us/who-we-are/business-areas/maeronauticse/skunkworks/sku m nc c n c n nkworks-careers.html 36. Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement (Standard Form 312) r r r e e e o Briefing Booklet - Lockheed Martin, o o t t t M M M l https://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed-martiln/eo/documents/employees/SF312 l o o o i l %20Briefing%20Booklet%202016.pidlf 37. Standard Form 312 - Classified Information i l i i i gt t g t g a Nondisclosure Agreement - Lockheed Maartin, a yr https://download.lockheedmartin.com/lmsrecurity/SF312.pdf y r y y y y .T T . T . ce e c e c oc c o c o S h S h S h mn n m n m e e e o o o c l o c l o c l o g g g r r r e y e y e y . . . c c c t S o tS o S t o M M M e m e m e m c c c i r ir r i l e le e l i i i t t M ttM t M t a a a i i i r l i lri l i r t t t y a ya a y r r r T y Ty y T T T T e e e e e e c c cc c c h h h h h h n n n n o on o n l l l o o o o o o g g g l y ly y l o . o. . o c c c S g o S go S o g e m e m e m y y y c c c r . r . r . e e e c c c t t t M o M o M o S S S i i i l m l m l m i i i e t e t te a a a c r c r rc y y y r T r T Tr e e e e ee c c c t t t h h h M M M n n n o o o i l i l li l o l o ol i i i g g g t t t a y a y ya . . . c c c r r r S o S o S o y y y e m e m e m T c c T c T r r r e e e e e e t t t c M M c M c h i l i l h i l h i i i t t t n a a n a n r r r o y y o y o T T T l l l o e e o e o c c c g h h g h g n n n y y y o o o . l l . l . o o o c c c g g g o y y o y o . . . m c c m c m o o o m m m