Primary Intelligence Asset

TauZero InterstellarPropulsion 2018

Declassified Public record OCR verified
INTEL

Executive Summary

This report outlines a NASA-funded study to create a standardized system for evaluating the feasibility and cost of different interstellar travel technologies. It establishes a framework to compare current propulsion methods with theoretical breakthroughs to determine which options are most realistic for future space missions.
Analysis Confidence: High
ST_CODE: B5A6B5

System Metadata

Source ID

DOC-TAUZERO_

Process Date

8/9/2026

Integrity Hash

SHA256-c3q15jod63p...

Indexer Status

COMPLETE

Initializing_Secure_Viewer...
[ DOWNLOAD_ORIGINAL_ASSET ]

INVESTIGATIVE ANALYSIS

Summary

This report outlines a NASA-funded study to create a standardized system for evaluating the feasibility and cost of different interstellar travel technologies. It establishes a framework to compare current propulsion methods with theoretical breakthroughs to determine which options are most realistic for future space missions.

Origin

The report was prepared by Marc G. Millis, Jeff Greason, and Rhonda Stevenson of the Tau Zero Foundation for NASA Headquarters, specifically the Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) and NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC). The digital copy contains watermarks from 'SecretMilitaryTechnology.com'.

Purpose

The research was conducted to develop a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and an evaluation process for interstellar propulsion and power options, aiming to provide equitable comparisons between disparate technologies based on energy, mass, time, and infrastructure requirements.

Why It Matters

" This document serves as a bridge between mainstream NASA-funded research and the search for unconventional propulsion breakthroughs. It formalizes the study of 'breakthrough' advances within a professional aerospace framework, linking known entities like the Tau Zero Foundation to the broader investigation into advanced aerospace black programs and potential non-traditional physics-based propulsion. "

Key Claims

  • The study was funded under NASA Grant No. NNX17AE81G.
  • The project was overseen by NASA officials Dr. Jay Falker, Jason Derleth, and Dr. Mike LaPointe.
  • The report identifies three specific 'eras of readiness' for missions: precursors, the era of infrastructure, and the era of breakthroughs.
  • Jim Gilland of the Ohio Aerospace Institute and Paul Gilster of the Tau Zero Foundation provided assistance to the study.

Contribution to the Field

This document contributes a formal methodology for converting the performance of wildly different propulsion concepts—ranging from traditional rockets to theoretical breakthroughs—into common 'figures of merit' categorized by three eras of technological readiness.

Full Transcript

Transcript

Page 1 of 10

INTRODUCTION

Millis 2018 Grant NNX17AE81G_for_CR.docx pg 1 of 69 Breakthrough Propulsion Study Assessing Interstellar Flight Challenges and Prospects NASA Grant No. NNX17AE81G First Year Report Prepared by: Marc G. Millis, Jeff Greason, Rhonda Stevenson Tau Zero Foundation Business Office: 1053 East Third Avenue Broomfield, CO 80020 Prepared for: NASA Headquarters, Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) and NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) Washington, DC 20546 June 2018 pg 2 of 69 Millis 2018 Grant NNX17AE81G_for_CR.docx

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this document?
This report outlines a NASA-funded study to create a standardized system for evaluating the feasibility and cost of different interstellar travel technologies. It establishes a framework to compare current propulsion methods with theoretical breakthroughs to determine which options are most realisti...
Where does this document come from?
The report was prepared by Marc G. Millis, Jeff Greason, and Rhonda Stevenson of the Tau Zero Foundation for NASA Headquarters, specifically the Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) and NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC). The digital copy contains watermarks from 'SecretMilitaryTechnology.com'.
What is the research purpose of this document?
The research was conducted to develop a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and an evaluation process for interstellar propulsion and power options, aiming to provide equitable comparisons between disparate technologies based on energy, mass, time, and infrastructure requirements.
Where is this document cited in the investigation?
This document is referenced in 5 places across the investigation: 4 Dossiers, 1 Research Rounds. See the "Cited In" section below for the complete list of pages that reference this document.