Page 1
S S S S S S
e e e
e c e c c e
r r r
c e c e e c
r t M r t M t M r
e e e
i i i
l l l
t i t i i t
t t t
M a M a a M
r r r
y y y
i T i T T i
l l l
i e i e e i
t t t
c c c
a a a
h h h
r n r n n r
y o y o o y
l l l
T o T o o T
g g g
e y e y y e
. . .
c c c c c c
S o S o S o
h h h
e m e m e m
nc c n c n
r Intelligence rProfile: CBH Technologries
e e e
o o o
t t t
M M M
l and the UnLAB Nexus l l
o o o
i i i
l l l
i i i
gt t g t g
a a a
yr y Executive Summary r y y r y y
.T T . T .
ce e c e c
oc This report provides a consolidated intelligence acssessment of CBH Technoloogies and its c o
S h S h S h
associated non-profit, UnLAB, entities co-founded by former Lockheed Martin Skunk Works®
mn n m n m
e oprogram meanager Charles Chase. The primary objectiove of this investigation was to determine ief o
c thleose entitiesc function as a corporate continuation vehiclleo for research and development related c l o
r to theg clandestinre U.S. Compact Fusion Reactor (CFR/FRCg) program. r g
e The inv y estigation ceoncludes with HIGH CONFIDENCE that U y nLAB represents a thematic and e y
. . .
c c c
t S technologic o al evolutiotnS of the strategic goals of the clandestine U. o S. advanceSd propulsion t o
M M M
e program. Whimle it is not ae direct continuation in terms of personnel omr institutioneal affiliation, it is m
c c c
a clear successor in terms of its scientific objectives, executed under a new, more agile, and
i r ir r i
l e le e l
i deliberately low-signature corpiorate and funding structure. i
t t M This assessment is based on th tt eM convergence of several key findings. First, the inves t tiMgation t
a a a
i uncovered a sophisticated, bifurcateid corporate architecture consisting of a public-facing i
r l i lri l i r
y t a 501(c)(3) non-profit (Unlab Inc.) and at yfaor-profit R&D entity (UnLAB LLC). This structure is t a y
T r y optimized for operational flexibility, allowinr Ty g the non-profit to engage in public outreach and r y T
T fundraising while the for-profit arm pursues pTroprietary, government-funded research. The target T
e e e
e entity, "CBH Technologies," appears to be a deeliberately unregistered placeholder name used by e
c c cc c c
hChase to maintain an extremely low corporate signhature. h
h h h
nSecond, a technical deconstruction of the entities' mnissions reveals a stark contrast between a n
n o benign, public-facing cover story of "next-generation lig onhting" and a verifiable, hardware-focused o n
l l l
o o o
o research program in advanced propulsion. The actual misosion, confirmed by a National Science o
g g g
l Foundaytion (NSF) Small Business Innovation Research (SBIRly) award, is "Fluctuation Flow y l
o . o. . o
Propulsiocn," a concept based on extracting motive force from qucantum vacuum fluctuations c
S g using asymometric nan S ostructures and Resonant Tunneling Diodesgo. This repr S esents a tangible, o g
e m e m e m
y materials-science-based evolution of the highly theoretical physics puyrsued by the legacy y
c c c
r . NAVAIR "white" program. r . r .
e e e
c c c
t Finally, a comprehensive humant network analysis reveals a complete and deliberate t
M o M o M o
S compaSrtmentalization between Chase's new entities and the entire established personnel S
i i i
l i mnetwork of the legacy CFR/FRC progl iram. This absence of links is a strong indicmator of l i m
e t e t te
a a a
professional counter-intelligence tradecraft. The investigation's most significant finding is the
c r c r rc
y identification of Chase's co-founder, Catheyrine McKinnon, a researcher in morphing surfaces y
r T r T Tr
and analog computation. This partnership suggests UnLAB's objective is a radical,
e e e e ee
c cross-disciplinary fusion of next-generation physcics, materials, and computation, representing a c
t t t
h h h
M potential new technologMical trajectory beyond the original FRC-based approach. M
n n n
o o o
i Plart 1: Corporatie and Technical lForensics (PIR-1) li
l o l o ol
i i i
g g g
t t t
a y a y ya
1.1 Co.rporate Structure and Signature Analysi.s .
c c c
r r r
S o S o S o
y y y
e m e m e m
The corporate architecture surrounding Charles Chase's post-Lockheed Martin activities is a
T c c T c T
r r r
e e e e e e
t t t
c M M c M c
h i l i l h i l h
i i i
t t t
n a a n a n
r r r
o y y o y o
T T T
l l l
o e e o e o
c c c
g h h g h g
n n n
y y y
o o o
. l l . l .
o o o
c c c
g g g
o y y o y o
. . .
m c c m c m
o o o
m m m