Primary Intelligence Asset

Disclosure of Urgent Concern(s); Complaint of Reprisal - In Re: David C. Grusch

Declassified Public record OCR verified
INTEL

Executive Summary

This document is a formal whistleblower complaint and disclosure of urgent concern submitted to the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) on behalf of David C. Grusch by Compass Rose Legal Group, PLLC. Grusch alleges the intentional withholding and concealment of classified Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) information from the United States Congress, as well as subsequent unlawful retaliation and security clearance reprisals against him following his initial protected disclosures to the Department of Defense Inspector General.
Analysis Confidence: High
ST_CODE: FILING

System Metadata

Source ID

DOC-DAVID-GR

Process Date

Public archive record

Integrity Hash

SHA256-DAVIDGRUSCHP...

Indexer Status

COMPLETE

Initializing_Secure_Viewer...
[ DOWNLOAD_ORIGINAL_ASSET ]

Full Transcript

Transcript

Page 1 of 4

Page 1

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY INSPECTOR GENERAL IN RE: DAVID C. GRUSCH GS-15 Civilian, NGA Disclosure of Urgent Concern(s) Complaint of Reprisal DISCLOSURE OF URGENT CONCERN(S); COMPLAINT OF REPRISAL 1. We come before you to file this disclosure on behalf of David C. Grusch, who is currently a GS-15 employee at the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA). He is a veteran of the United States Air Force (USAF) and has worked directly for or with several IC elements over the course of his lengthy and successful career. He is currently cleared at the TS/SCI level by the NGA and serves as that Agency's Senior Technical Advisor for Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) analysis. He is also an Intelligence Officer in the USAF Reserves. 2. The Intelligence Community Inspector General ("ICIG") has jurisdiction to receive a report of Urgent Concern when the disclosure involves, among other things, "a false statement to Congress, or a willful withholding from Congress, on an issue of material fact relating to the funding, administration, or operation of an intelligence activity." 50 U.S.C. § 3033(k)(5)(G)(ii). Moreover, jurisdiction exists when "an action, including a personnel action described in section 2302(a)(92)(A) of title 5, United States Code, constituting reprisal or threat of reprisal prohibited under subsection E(3)(B) in response to an employee's reporting an urgent concern . . .". 50 U.S.C. § 3033(k)(5)(G)(iii). 3. Mr. Grusch previously served as a fully cleared member of the United States (US) Government's UAP Task Force. He has direct knowledge that certain IC elements have purposely and intentionally

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this document?
This document is a formal whistleblower complaint and disclosure of urgent concern submitted to the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) on behalf of David C. Grusch by Compass Rose Legal Group, PLLC. Grusch alleges the intentional withholding and concealment of classified Unidentified Ae...