archived as http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Sarfatti_12.doc (also ...Sarfatti_12.pdf) => doc pdf URL-doc URL-pdf more from Dr. Sarfatti and UFOs is on the /UFO.htm#Sarfatti page at doc pdf URL note: because important websites are frequently "here today but gone tomorrow", the following was archived from http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SarfattiScienceSeminars/message/4113 on July 8, 2003. This is NOT an attempt to divert readers from the aforementioned website. Indeed, the reader should only read this back-up copy if it cannot be found at the original author's site. Firmage / Puthoff / Byrd's past attempts to duplicate UFOs Message 4113 of 4117 From: Jack Sarfatti <Sarfatti@P...> Date: Wed Jul 9, 2003 9:36 pm Subject: Re: Nature on Metric Engineering UFO Star Gates On Wednesday, July 9, 2003, at 06:10 AM, StealthSkater wrote: > In the conclusion of your excellent Ukraine.doc paper, you mentioned the Brookhaven RHIC project whose goal was to create the "cosmic soup" that the inflationary model of the Big Bang predicted existed at the start. [note: I don't know how this compares to later Ekopyrotic models which utilize a slow collision of 5-D membranes instead that produces the same results without a need for gravity waves or monopoles] > > As I recall, many scientists world-wide objected to this project because of conditions that might arise and prove catastrophic to the Earth (if not the Universe). "Strangelets" was one such possibility. (In fact, didn't someone propose it was a strangelet snaking across the Universe that was responsible for that Siberian explosion?) > > One of the major questions in the UFO field has always been WHY are 'they' here? Some suggest we are either direct creations of them or have been "genetically altered" over thousands-of-years by them. A more selfish reason is what your ending paragraphs alluded to -- that being simple self-preservation. In their eyes, we are tinkering with forces that -- under the right situations -- cause them as much harm as ourselves. That would certainly explain why UFOs and atomic energy (especially weapons testing/production) seem to go hand-in-hand. If the latter is minimized, then so are the UFO sightings. Yes, exactly. > > Before I finish, I appreciate the years of soul-searching, reflection, and debates with colleagues over all these theories. They offer one side of the "equation". The other side being of course is the technologies required to create 'exotic matter' and bend/fold spacetime. I realize theorists are "immune" to this part, but are there any clues as to what form this technology would be in (e.g., rotating magnetic fields, nano-engineered Type III superconductors, quantum lasers, etc.)? Any good books/papers/websites that you could recommend? The basic equations are toward the end of my paper on the Josephson coupling of g|e-e-|g> to <0|e+e-|0>. A big problem is the "impedance matching", see Ray Chiao's "gravity radio" papers on a related problem - it's not identical to what I am talking about but not orthogonal either. There are no papers in the field other than my own because I have only recently created this new approach. It has not sunk in and it may take years. The flying saucers show us that a technology of the /\zpf field exists only that US DOD, DOE, NSA, CIA et-al do not have it. I am the best they got at the moment. In fact I am ALL they got that's real pointing the right way IMO of course. Hal Puthoff & Co's "PV theory" represents what they hope they have and that theory is a joke IMHO. See the recent Mitre Conference on HFGR. > Of course what I'm asking for is a "Manhattan Project" equivalent where you had all the theorists on one side and the engineers coming up with schemes to make the former's equations come to fruition. This has been the most frustrating part for me all along. I think I could understand the physics better if I had some clue as to what physical mechanisms were to be employed to "make it hap'n, cap'n!" That's what Joe Firmage wanted to do with ISSO. He made unwise financial decisions and the project only lasted a year and a half 1999 - 2000. That's what CIA Station Chief Harold Chipman wanted to do in 1985. Those documents are in my book "Destiny Matrix". However, the time was not ripe, I did not have the right ideas back then. The right ideas had to wait for the discoveries of both "dark matter" first and "dark energy" second. The full experimental picture only was made available to public Feb 11, 2003 although my two books Destiny Matrix and Space-Time and Beyond II at end of 2002 anticipate the results of NASA WMAP that were confirmed. That's what Hal Puthoff's IAS is supposed to be about but he is barking up the wrong tree, same for Eric Davis's "Warp Metrics". That's what Senator Robert Byrd's ISR in W.Va. was supposed to be about also with Jim Corum's stuff, but that does not work either as we found out at ISSO with our million dollar contract with SARA of Huntington Beach where Corum came from before he went to ISR. So far The Right Stuff you see in http://qedcorp.com/APS/Ukraine.doc is a One Man Show. WYSYYG. However there are some interesting theory things brewing in Russia, Finland and Kiev in the Ukraine, and possibly some experimental stuff in Beograd with the J.P. Vigier group. My theory does justify Vigier's basic idea for "cold fusion" i.e. "tight atomic states" i.e. spatially extended electron as a Bohm hidden variable, that appears as a point particle in high-energy scattering even though it really isn't in low-energy scattering and most importantly in atomic bound states. This is what the Serbs are trying to achieve in a practical way. Will they succeed? I don't know. I am not in touch with them though maybe I will see them in Paris this September. We had Vigier at ISSO and that was one good thing in terms of development of my theory in http://qedcorp.com/APS/Ukraine.doc if on the Internet, press <BACK> on your browser to return to the previous page (or go to www.stealthskater.com) else if accessing these files from the CD in a MS-Word session, simply <CLOSE> this file's window-session; the previous window-session should still remain 'active'