PROGRAM · Main Graph

UAPDisclosureAct

PROGRAM Main Graph Dossier Available

Summary

UAP Disclosure Act — legislative trajectory. Kona Blue = proposed SAP for crash retrieval exploitation (terminated 2012). UAP Disclosure Act = legislative attempt to force disclosure. Kona Blue was the executive branch attempt; Disclosure Act is the congressional attempt. Same goal. Sheehan's NPI uses litigation to compel disclosure. UAP Disclosure Act uses legislation. NPI (legal) + UAP Disclosure Act (legislative) = two approaches to same goal. Pentagon Papers precedent = public right to know.

Intelligence Analysis

UAP Disclosure Act

Purpose: UAP Disclosure Act — legislative trajectory Category: Policy & Disclosure This node documents UAP Disclosure Act, a policy or disclosure milestone. It connects to 25 entities, tracing the political and institutional dimensions of UAP transparency efforts.

Key Relationships

  • ← Lacatski (Kona Blue) (assessment): Kona Blue = proposed SAP for crash retrieval exploitation (terminated 2012). UAP Disclosure Act = legislative attempt to force disclosure. Kona Blue was the executive branch attempt; Disclosure Act is the congressional attempt. Same goal.
  • ← Sheehan (NPI/Lawyer) (assessment): Sheehan's NPI uses litigation to compel disclosure. UAP Disclosure Act uses legislation. NPI (legal) + UAP Disclosure Act (legislative) = two approaches to same goal. Pentagon Papers precedent = public right to know.
  • ← Sep 2025 Hearing (assessment): Sep 2025 hearing = continued legislative pressure for UAP disclosure. 'Whistleblower Protection' focus. Task Force on Declassification = new House structure. Supports UAP Disclosure Act refiled for FY2027 NDAA.
  • ← Fox 'The Program' (assessment): Fox discusses Eminent Domain provisions of UAP Disclosure Act. 'If government implemented Eminent Domain, would companies give property up?' 'Ufology's version of Ruby Ridge.' Predicts contractor resistance.
  • → LMT 2025 10-K (3 Programs) (assessment): Eminent domain provision 'assumes recovered technology under corporate custody' = Lockheed. $3.58B classified losses = the programs HPSCI protects. Turner blocks disclosure = protecting Lockheed programs.
  • → Knapp (LMT-BAASS) (assessment): Knapp: Lockheed-BAASS materials negotiation. Disclosure Act eminent domain = legal mechanism to seize such materials from private custody. HPSCI strips eminent domain = protecting Lockheed's materials.

Plus 19 additional connections.

Key Findings

  • ▸ Purpose: UAP Disclosure Act — legislative trajectory
  • ▸ ← Lacatski (Kona Blue) (assessment): Kona Blue = proposed SAP for crash retrieval exploitation (terminated 2012). UAP Disclosure Act = legislative attempt to force disclosure. Kona Blue was the executive branch attempt; Disclosure Act is the congressional attempt. Same goal.
  • ▸ ← Sheehan (NPI/Lawyer) (assessment): Sheehan's NPI uses litigation to compel disclosure. UAP Disclosure Act uses legislation. NPI (legal) + UAP Disclosure Act (legislative) = two approaches to same goal. Pentagon Papers precedent = public right to know.
  • ▸ ← Sep 2025 Hearing (assessment): Sep 2025 hearing = continued legislative pressure for UAP disclosure. 'Whistleblower Protection' focus. Task Force on Declassification = new House structure. Supports UAP Disclosure Act refiled for FY2027 NDAA.
  • ▸ ← Fox 'The Program' (assessment): Fox discusses Eminent Domain provisions of UAP Disclosure Act. 'If government implemented Eminent Domain, would companies give property up?' 'Ufology's version of Ruby Ridge.' Predicts contractor resistance.

Network Linkage

Connected to 25 entities (25 assessments). Primary links: Lacatski (Kona Blue), Sheehan (NPI/Lawyer), Sep 2025 Hearing, Fox 'The Program', LMT 2025 10-K (3 Programs).

Related Entities (25)

MellonDisclosureFdn

PERSON
→ Mellon = Disclosure Foundation Chairman. Advocates for UAP Disclosure Act. Schumer+Rounds modeled on JFK Act. Mellon's network = political advocacy for legislation.
Dossier Main Graph

AAROVol1Criticism

PROGRAM
→ Disclosure Act designed to force AARO transparency. AARO Vol 1 = 'no evidence' (limited hangout). Disclosure Act would create review board to override AARO. HPSCI blocks it.
Dossier Main Graph

ImmaculateConstellation

PROGRAM
→ Disclosure Act eminent domain provision 'assumes recovered technology under corporate custody.' Immaculate Constellation USAP = the hidden program. Act would force disclosure of USAP records.
Dossier Main Graph

ShellenbergerImmaculate

PERSON
→ Shellenberger revealed Immaculate Constellation (Nov 2024). Disclosure Act (filed June 2026) would force records release. Same goal: expose hidden USAP.
Dossier Main Graph

ElizondoFullTestimony

PERSON
→ Elizondo: 'hidden from elected representatives.' Disclosure Act = legislative fix for the hiding. Schumer+Rounds responding to Elizondo/Grusch testimony. HPSCI blocks = protecting the hiding.
Dossier Main Graph

LMT202510K3Programs

PROGRAM
→ Eminent domain provision 'assumes recovered technology under corporate custody' = Lockheed. $3.58B classified losses = the programs HPSCI protects. Turner blocks disclosure = protecting Lockheed programs.
Dossier Main Graph

Reid22MAAWSAP

PERSON
→ Reid (2008) secured $22M + SAP requests. Schumer+Rounds (2023) = continuation of Reid's political fight. Both Senate champions. Both blocked by existing classified programs.
Dossier Main Graph

KnappLMTBAASS

PERSON
→ Knapp: Lockheed-BAASS materials negotiation. Disclosure Act eminent domain = legal mechanism to seize such materials from private custody. HPSCI strips eminent domain = protecting Lockheed's materials.
Dossier Main Graph

WendtSovereignty

PERSON
← Wendt explains WHY HPSCI blocks Disclosure Act. Anthropocentric state can't handle ET possibility. Turner's opposition = protecting sovereignty, not just classified programs.
Dossier Main Graph

McConnell37yrSASC

PERSON
← McConnell = 'helped draft UAP-related legislation.' 37 years on SASC/SSCI/HPSCI. Behind-the-scenes architect of UAP oversight. Disclosure Act = continuation of his work.
Dossier Main Graph

July2023Hearing

EVENT
← July 2023 hearing directly led to UAP Disclosure Act (Schumer+Rounds, July 2023). Hearing provided political momentum. Three witnesses under oath = congressional action.
Dossier Main Graph

FoxTheProgram

PERSON
← Fox discusses Eminent Domain provisions of UAP Disclosure Act. 'If government implemented Eminent Domain, would companies give property up?' 'Ufology's version of Ruby Ridge.' Predicts contractor resistance.
Dossier Main Graph

CorbellUAPPuzzle

PERSON
← Corbell: 'Legislation submitted for 2024 NDAA poised to assist this process.' = UAP Disclosure Act. Corbell's report = journalistic support for legislative effort.
Dossier Main Graph

Sep2025Hearing

EVENT
← Sep 2025 hearing = continued legislative pressure for UAP disclosure. 'Whistleblower Protection' focus. Task Force on Declassification = new House structure. Supports UAP Disclosure Act refiled for FY2027 NDAA.
Dossier Main Graph

NellFullBackground

PERSON
← Nell helped shape 2022/2023 NDAA language (whistleblower protection, historical review). Sol 2023: Schumer Amendment + controlled disclosure. Legislative architect + Sol speaker.
Dossier Main Graph

SkafishWhitePaper

PERSON
← Skafish White Paper proposes 'Senate Inquiry' and 'Congressional Response.' = academic support for UAP Disclosure Act. 'Nonanthropogenic vehicles' = legal framework for legislation.
Dossier Main Graph

SALTConference

EVENT
← Nell at SALT: UAP Disclosure Act 'hollowed out' — independent review board removed. 'Controlled disclosure' vs 'catastrophic.' Warned of risk. Gang of Eight 'not told truth.'
Dossier Main Graph

Jun2026CapitolPress

EVENT
← Capitol press conference demands UAP Disclosure Act passage. S.Amdt.3111 'gutted' — demands restoration. Three formal demands = legislative strategy.
Dossier Main Graph

JapanUAPCaucus

EVENT
← Japan's UAP caucus = international dimension of disclosure. U.S. Disclosure Act + Japan caucus = allied coordination. June 2026 Capitol press conference demanded 'international coordination.'
Dossier Main Graph

TrumpEOUAP

EVENT
← Congressional legislation (Disclosure Act) was 'gutted.' Presidential directive bypasses Congress. Two tracks: legislative (Disclosure Act) + executive (Trump order). Same goal, different branches.
Dossier Main Graph

LacatskiKonaBlue

PERSON
← Kona Blue = proposed SAP for crash retrieval exploitation (terminated 2012). UAP Disclosure Act = legislative attempt to force disclosure. Kona Blue was the executive branch attempt; Disclosure Act is the congressional attempt. Same goal.
Dossier Main Graph

PodestaClintonUFO

PERSON
← Podesta's 2002-2016 UFO advocacy created political momentum for the UAP Disclosure Act. Podesta (executive branch advocacy) → Schumer/Rubio (legislative action). Same Democratic disclosure tradition.
Dossier Main Graph

ReidSenateAAWSAP

PERSON
← Reid's 2008 AAWSAP earmark = first major congressional UAP action. UAP Disclosure Act (2023) = next major congressional action. Reid → Schumer/Rubio = 15-year congressional disclosure trajectory.
Dossier Main Graph

KirkpatrickAARO

PERSON
← Kirkpatrick's AARO was created by the UAP Disclosure Act. But Kirkpatrick failed to follow the congressional mandate. AARO = the government's response to disclosure pressure — and it failed.
Dossier Main Graph

SheehanNPILawyer

PERSON
← Sheehan's NPI uses litigation to compel disclosure. UAP Disclosure Act uses legislation. NPI (legal) + UAP Disclosure Act (legislative) = two approaches to same goal. Pentagon Papers precedent = public right to know.
Dossier Main Graph

Network Graph

Explore UAPDisclosureAct and its connections in the interactive network graph.

View in Network Graph

Source Documents (1)

Research References

Search the research archive for documents and investigations related to UAPDisclosureAct.

Search Research Archive

Frequently Asked Questions

What is UAPDisclosureAct? ▾
UAP Disclosure Act — legislative trajectory. Kona Blue = proposed SAP for crash retrieval exploitation (terminated 2012). UAP Disclosure Act = legislative attempt to force disclosure. Kona Blue was the executive branch attempt; Disclosure Act is the congressional attempt. Same goal. Sheehan's NPI uses litigation to compel disclosure. UAP Disclosure Act uses legislation. NPI (legal) + UAP Disclosure Act (legislative) = two approaches to same goal. Pentagon Papers precedent = public right to know.
What is UAPDisclosureAct connected to? ▾
UAPDisclosureAct is directly connected to 25 entities in the network graph, including MellonDisclosureFdn, AAROVol1Criticism, ImmaculateConstellation. These connections represent documented relationships such as Mellon = Disclosure Foundation Chairman. Advocates for UAP Disclosure Act. Schumer+Rounds modeled on JFK Act. Mellon's network = political advocacy for legislation., Disclosure Act designed to force AARO transparency. AARO Vol 1 = 'no evidence' (limited hangout). Disclosure Act would create review board to override AARO. HPSCI blocks it., Disclosure Act eminent domain provision 'assumes recovered technology under corporate custody.' Immaculate Constellation USAP = the hidden program. Act would force disclosure of USAP records.. Explore the full network using the interactive graph for complete relationship mapping.
Where can I find more details about UAPDisclosureAct? ▾
A full intelligence dossier is available for UAPDisclosureAct, including 1 source document, deep-dive analysis, and network linkage assessment. Visit the dossier page for the complete profile.
How does UAPDisclosureAct fit into the broader network? ▾
Connected to 25 entities (25 assessments). Primary links: Lacatski (Kona Blue), Sheehan (NPI/Lawyer), Sep 2025 Hearing, Fox 'The Program', LMT 2025 10-K (3 Programs).

Related Links

Network Graph Timeline Dossiers Glossary Research Full Dossier