Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Disclosure Act (UAPDA)
Represents the most extensive legislative effort to declassify anomalous defense data.
01 Definition
A proposed U.S. legislative measure to mandate federal declassification and establish eminent domain over non-human intelligence technologies.
02 Detailed_Analysis
The Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Disclosure Act (UAPDA), originally introduced by Senators Chuck Schumer and Mike Rounds as an amendment to the FY2024 National Defense Authorization Act, proposed a comprehensive statutory framework for government-wide UAP declassification. The legislation included provisions for an independent presidential review board and exercise of federal eminent domain over recovered technologies of unknown origin held by private defense contractors.
03 Key_Facts
- ▸ Introduced as a bipartisan amendment by Senators Chuck Schumer and Mike Rounds
- ▸ Proposed an independent presidential review board modeled on the JFK Assassination Act
- ▸ Contained statutory eminent domain provisions for non-human materials held by defense contractors
04 Deep_Dive_Intelligence
UAP Disclosure Act
Purpose: UAP Disclosure Act — legislative trajectory Category: Policy & Disclosure This node documents UAP Disclosure Act, a policy or disclosure milestone. It connects to 25 entities, tracing the political and institutional dimensions of UAP transparency efforts.
Key Relationships
- ← Lacatski (Kona Blue) (assessment): Kona Blue = proposed SAP for crash retrieval exploitation (terminated 2012). UAP Disclosure Act = legislative attempt to force disclosure. Kona Blue was the executive branch attempt; Disclosure Act is the congressional attempt. Same goal.
- ← Sheehan (NPI/Lawyer) (assessment): Sheehan's NPI uses litigation to compel disclosure. UAP Disclosure Act uses legislation. NPI (legal) + UAP Disclosure Act (legislative) = two approaches to same goal. Pentagon Papers precedent = public right to know.
- ← Sep 2025 Hearing (assessment): Sep 2025 hearing = continued legislative pressure for UAP disclosure. 'Whistleblower Protection' focus. Task Force on Declassification = new House structure. Supports UAP Disclosure Act refiled for FY2027 NDAA.
- ← Fox 'The Program' (assessment): Fox discusses Eminent Domain provisions of UAP Disclosure Act. 'If government implemented Eminent Domain, would companies give property up?' 'Ufology's version of Ruby Ridge.' Predicts contractor resistance.
- → LMT 2025 10-K (3 Programs) (assessment): Eminent domain provision 'assumes recovered technology under corporate custody' = Lockheed. $3.58B classified losses = the programs HPSCI protects. Turner blocks disclosure = protecting Lockheed programs.
- → Knapp (LMT-BAASS) (assessment): Knapp: Lockheed-BAASS materials negotiation. Disclosure Act eminent domain = legal mechanism to seize such materials from private custody. HPSCI strips eminent domain = protecting Lockheed's materials.
Plus 19 additional connections.
05 Intelligence_Analysis
UAP Disclosure Act
Purpose: UAP Disclosure Act — legislative trajectory Category: Policy & Disclosure This node documents UAP Disclosure Act, a policy or disclosure milestone. It connects to 25 entities, tracing the political and institutional dimensions of UAP transparency efforts.
Key Relationships
- ← Lacatski (Kona Blue) (assessment): Kona Blue = proposed SAP for crash retrieval exploitation (terminated 2012). UAP Disclosure Act = legislative attempt to force disclosure. Kona Blue was the executive branch attempt; Disclosure Act is the congressional attempt. Same goal.
- ← Sheehan (NPI/Lawyer) (assessment): Sheehan's NPI uses litigation to compel disclosure. UAP Disclosure Act uses legislation. NPI (legal) + UAP Disclosure Act (legislative) = two approaches to same goal. Pentagon Papers precedent = public right to know.
- ← Sep 2025 Hearing (assessment): Sep 2025 hearing = continued legislative pressure for UAP disclosure. 'Whistleblower Protection' focus. Task Force on Declassification = new House structure. Supports UAP Disclosure Act refiled for FY2027 NDAA.
- ← Fox 'The Program' (assessment): Fox discusses Eminent Domain provisions of UAP Disclosure Act. 'If government implemented Eminent Domain, would companies give property up?' 'Ufology's version of Ruby Ridge.' Predicts contractor resistance.
- → LMT 2025 10-K (3 Programs) (assessment): Eminent domain provision 'assumes recovered technology under corporate custody' = Lockheed. $3.58B classified losses = the programs HPSCI protects. Turner blocks disclosure = protecting Lockheed programs.
- → Knapp (LMT-BAASS) (assessment): Knapp: Lockheed-BAASS materials negotiation. Disclosure Act eminent domain = legal mechanism to seize such materials from private custody. HPSCI strips eminent domain = protecting Lockheed's materials.
Plus 19 additional connections.
09 FAQ
What is Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Disclosure Act (UAPDA)? ▾
Why does Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Disclosure Act (UAPDA) matter? ▾
Is there a detailed dossier for Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Disclosure Act (UAPDA)? ▾
Quick_Facts
- Category
- Programs
- Aliases
- Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Disclosure Act (UAPDA), unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-disclosure-act-uapda, UAPDA, uapda, Schumer-Rounds Amendment
- Sources
- 0