Cfr Ecosystem

Section I: The Prime Contractor Ecosystem: Confirming the Post-Freescale Control System Integrator (PIR-1)

The U.S. Clandestine Propulsion Portfolio: A Forensic Analysis of the FRC/CFR Industrial Ecosystem (2015-Present)

The catastrophic loss of the 20-person Freescale Semiconductor team aboard MH370 created a critical vulnerability in the FRC/CFR program’s development pathway. This team was identified as the sole, irreplaceable systems integration unit, possessing the unique expertise required to bridge the platform’s fusion power source with a functional prototype. The central challenge was the development of a custom, radiation-hardened (rad-hard) System-on-Chip (SoC) capable of meeting the unprecedented computational demands of the platform’s control system, termed the “Trivergence Protocol”. A forensic analysis of the U.S. defense industrial base for the period of 2015-2020 indicates with high confidence that BAE Systems’ Electronic Systems sector, specifically its facility in Manassas, Virginia, was the only viable contractor to replace this capability. BAE Systems’ Manassas facility is a world leader in the development and production of rad-hard Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs) and SoCs for the most demanding national security missions. It is certified by the Department of Defense (DoD) as a Category 1A Microelectronics Trusted Source, a critical designation for any contractor handling the development of sensitive, mission-critical microelectronics. The company’s portfolio is replete with high-reliability SoCs designed to operate flawlessly in the extreme radiation and thermal environments of space, a direct technological parallel to the harsh electromagnetic and radiological environment generated by a compact fusion reactor. The most dispositive evidence establishing BAE Systems as the logical successor is a direct corporate and technological lineage to Freescale itself. A BAE Systems technical document for

This section establishes the industrial base for the mature Field-Reversed Configuration/Compact Fusion Reactor (FRC/CFR) platform, focusing on the critical vulnerability created by the 2014 loss of the Freescale Semiconductor systems integration team and identifying the most probable successor for the development of the platform’s bespoke, high-performance flight control system. The analysis reveals a sophisticated, multi-layered industrial architecture involving several prime contractors, each fulfilling a distinct and deliberately compartmentalized role.

1.1 BAE Systems as the Logical Successor: A Deep Dive into Rad-Hard SoC Capabilities

1.2 The Operational Test Nexus: Edwards AFB and the Bifurcated Prime Contractor Model

its 45nm RH45 standard cell ASIC technology explicitly states that the technology was “developed with state-of-the-art intellectual property licensed from Freescale Semiconductor Limited”. This is a critical link, demonstrating that BAE Systems not only possessed a similar capability but had already integrated Freescale’s foundational IP into its own rad-hard design libraries. This pre-existing technological integration would have dramatically reduced the time and risk required to reconstitute the FRC/CFR control system program, making BAE the obvious and low-risk choice for program leadership. While open-source databases do not contain a specific contract titled “FRC Control System,” a pattern of deep and sustained collaboration between BAE Systems and Lockheed Martin during the period of interest provides powerful corroborating evidence. BAE Systems has been a key supplier to Lockheed Martin for the GPS III satellite program, providing the RAD750 and next-generation RAD5545 single-board computers that serve as the core of the satellite’s command and control functions. This demonstrates an established, trusted prime/sub-contractor relationship in the exact domain of high-reliability, rad-hard space electronics. This existing partnership provided the ideal, low-signature contractual and programmatic channels through which a highly classified work package for the FRC/CFR control system could be managed.

The operational testing and evaluation of a revolutionary aerospace platform like the FRC/CFR vehicle requires a secure, instrumented, and highly controlled environment. The nexus for this activity is Edwards Air Force Base, California, home to the Air Force Test Center and the 412th Test Wing. The career of Colonel Matthew P. Giese, a senior USAF test pilot, serves as the human vector connecting the clandestine program to this operational test hub. Col. Giese’s official USAF biography confirms a unique and strategically significant career path. After a distinguished active-duty career as a test pilot for the F-16 and F-22, he transitioned to the Air Force Reserve, where he currently serves as the Individual Mobilization Augmentee (IMA) to the 412th Test Wing Commander at Edwards AFB. In this senior role, he assists in leading the developmental test and evaluation of the Air Force’s most advanced platforms. Concurrently, his biography states that in his civilian capacity, “Giese is the Chief Pilot for a major defense contractor and has flown multiple first flights for the USAF and foreign partners”. This dual-hatted status places him at the absolute apex of the U.S. flight test enterprise, serving as a seamless interface between a prime contractor’s proprietary development efforts and the USAF’s formal test and evaluation requirements. A critical finding, however, reveals a more complex industrial structure than a simple Lockheed Martin-led program. While Lockheed Martin Skunk Works® is the established developer of the FRC/CFR platform itself, multiple, verifiable open-source records from 2017-2021 identify Col. Giese’s civilian employer as The Boeing Company. Specifically, he is identified as Boeing’s F-15 Chief Test Pilot and a key test pilot for programs like the F-15EX. This is not a contradiction but rather evidence of a sophisticated, bifurcated operational test model. In this structure, Lockheed Martin develops the exotic platform, while Boeing, through its Phantom Works and Test & Evaluation divisions, is contracted to serve as the lead for flight operations and testing. This arrangement leverages the unique strengths of each contractor: Skunk Works’ unparalleled expertise in developing revolutionary, classified platforms, and Boeing’s vast infrastructure and experience in conducting large-scale flight test campaigns for the USAF. This operational model is further substantiated by the deep, pre-existing partnership between BAE Systems and Boeing

1.3 The DARPA POSH Influence: A Strategic Response to Systemic Vulnerability

in the domain of flight controls. In 2015, Boeing selected BAE Systems to provide the complete suite of flight control electronics for its 777X aircraft, including the Integrated Flight Control Electronics (IFCE) and the Remote Electronic Units (REUs) that are critical to the fly-by-wire system. Furthermore, BAE Systems and Boeing have collaborated extensively on testing the Eagle Passive/Active Warning and Survivability System (EPAWSS) for the F-15 fleet at the Benefield Anechoic Facility at Edwards AFB. This establishes a clear operational nexus at Edwards AFB involving the same key corporate players—BAE Systems and Boeing—and the same key personnel—Col. Giese—implicated in the FRC/CFR program. This bifurcated structure also serves as a powerful counter-intelligence and risk management tool. It deliberately compartmentalizes knowledge; Boeing test pilots can focus on evaluating the platform’s flight characteristics and mission systems without needing access to the deep physics of the Skunk Works®-developed propulsion and power source. It also mitigates public relations risk; any potential incident during the high-risk flight test phase would be publicly associated with a Boeing test flight, creating a layer of plausible deniability that shields the core Lockheed Martin “black” program from immediate scrutiny.

The 2014 Freescale incident exposed a systemic vulnerability in the DoD’s approach to developing mission-critical hardware. The reliance on a single, highly specialized, and proprietary team created a single point of failure that nearly derailed a program of national strategic importance. The strategic response from the U.S. government’s advanced research enterprise appears to have been the creation of the DARPA Posh Open Source Hardware (POSH) program. Announced in 2017 as part of the broader Electronics Resurgence Initiative (ERI), the POSH program’s stated objective was to address the prohibitive costs and complexity of modern SoC design by creating a sustainable ecosystem of open-source, verified hardware IP blocks. The program’s goal was to “eliminate the need to start from scratch with every new design” and to “democratize access to custom, high-performance SoCs”. The timing and explicit language of the POSH program strongly suggest it was a direct strategic corrective action, designed to prevent a future “Freescale incident” by fostering a more resilient, distributed, and less vulnerable supply chain for the bespoke microelectronics required by advanced defense systems. While BAE Systems was not listed as a primary research performer in the initial POSH announcements, which focused on academic institutions and commercial firms like Northrop Grumman and Cadence , the company is a key participant in the broader ERI ecosystem. BAE’s work on other DARPA programs, such as Cyber-Hunting at Scale (CHASE), confirms its role as a trusted partner for the agency’s most advanced initiatives. The strategic shift signaled by DARPA through POSH—away from proprietary, single-source solutions and toward a more open and verifiable model—would have inevitably influenced the development pathway for the FRC/CFR platform’s replacement control system. This government-led initiative provided both the impetus and the technological framework for BAE Systems to develop a next-generation SoC that was not only more powerful but also built upon a more secure and resilient design philosophy, directly addressing the critical vulnerability exposed in 2014.

Provided

2019-2020

Contract Date/Period

Program/Platform Technology

Lockheed Martin GPS III Satellites RAD750 &

RAD5545 Single Board Computers (SBCs)

Table 1.1: BAE Systems Prime Contractor Relationship Matrix (2015-2020) Counterparty

Significance to FRC/CFR Program Establishes a direct, trusted prime/sub relationship for providing high-reliability, rad-hard command & control electronics for national security space assets during the period of interest. Demonstrates a deep partnership in advanced avionics, with joint testing conducted at Edwards AFB, the operational nexus for the FRC/CFR platform. Confirms BAE’s role as the provider of the complete suite of flight control electronics for a state-of-the-art Boeing fly-by-wire system, a direct parallel to the required FRC/CFR capability.

Section II: Deconstruction of the “Gray Track”

Integrated Flight Control Electronics (IFCE) & Remote Electronic Units (REUs)

AN/ALQ-250 Digital Electronic Warfare System

The Boeing Company

F-15 EPAWSS

2015-Ongoing

777X Aircraft

Ecosystem and Trajectory (PIR-2)

2.1 Corporate and Financial Architecture: UnLAB and FPT

This section conducts a deep-dive forensic analysis of the emergent, government-sponsored “gray track” entities. These small, agile ventures represent a deliberate strategy to cultivate a diversified portfolio of parallel, high-risk, high-reward technological pathways. The analysis assesses their corporate structures, funding sources, key personnel, and technological trajectories, revealing a sophisticated ecosystem designed to operate with plausible deniability while pursuing revolutionary physics.

The corporate structures of the identified “gray track” entities are not conventional startup models; they are sophisticated architectures designed for operational security and strategic flexibility, allowing them to receive government funding while maintaining an extremely low public profile. UnLAB Inc. & LLC: The corporate architecture surrounding former Skunk Works® program manager Charles Chase is a bifurcated construct designed for maximum operational flexibility. The public-facing entity is Unlab Inc., a registered 501(c)(3) non-profit organization based in Savannah, Georgia, granted tax-exempt status in June 2019. IRS Form 990 filings identify the principal officers as Charles Chase (President) and Catherine McKinnon (Director), and detail revenue streams and compensation. This non-profit arm serves as the “white world” vehicle, capable of soliciting tax-deductible donations, hosting conferences like the APE series, and conducting public outreach under a benign scientific mission. Operating in parallel is UnLAB LLC, a for-profit partnership founded in June 2023. This entity serves as the “gray world” operational arm. It is structured to receive government R&D contracts and hold proprietary intellectual property. Federal award databases confirm UnLAB LLC is the recipient of National Science Foundation (NSF) Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase I award 2432831 for approximately $275,000, active from August 2024 to July 2025. This dual structure allows for the strategic “laundering” of technology: concepts can be explored in the open, non-profit sphere, while tangible, government-funded hardware development occurs within the firewalled, for-profit LLC. Field Propulsion Technologies Inc. (FPT): Founded in July 2017 by its CEO and Principal Investigator, Richard Banduric, FPT is a for-profit Subchapter S Corporation based in Aurora, Colorado. The company has amassed a significant and diverse portfolio of federal funding totaling over $2.8 million, confirming its status as a serious, government-vetted R&D entity. This funding includes an early ~$250,000 grant from DARPA under BAA HR001118S0045 for “Relativistic Electrodynamics and Exotic Propulsion”. More recently, FPT has secured substantial awards from both the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) and the NSF. The AFRL funding is explicitly dual-use: a Phase II SBIR award (FA864924P1048) for $1,249,947 is for a “compact radiation emitter” intended as a directed energy weapon, while a smaller Phase I award is for a “propellant-less thruster”. Simultaneously, the NSF has awarded FPT over $1.25 million across Phase I (2213139) and Phase II (2423107) SBIR grants for its propulsion concept. The fact that a single DoD agency (AFRL) is funding the development of both a weapon and a propulsion system from the same core technology is dispositive proof that the government views FPT’s work as a unified, dual-use platform technology.

2.2 Profile: Catherine McKinnon and the Fusion of Disciplines

A central figure in the emergent UnLAB “gray track” is co-founder Catherine McKinnon. Generating a comprehensive profile requires careful disambiguation from other prominent individuals, most notably the feminist legal scholar Catharine A. MacKinnon. Verifiable evidence, including her appearance alongside Charles Chase in a 2022 video discussing UnLAB and her use of an “unlab.us” email address on public blogs, definitively identifies the person of interest as Kate McKinnon, a researcher and artist who leads the “Contemporary Geometric Beadwork” project. While her background in artistic beadwork may seem unrelated to advanced propulsion, an analysis of her work through the technical lens of the user’s query reveals a profound relevance. Her project is an open-source, collaborative exploration of creating complex, three-dimensional structures with emergent properties based on underlying geometric rules. This is the fundamental principle of “metamaterials,” where novel physical properties are derived not from the material’s composition but from its engineered, sub-wavelength structure. Her hands-on work in creating precisely ordered, repeating geometric forms that can be designed to fold or change shape is a direct, tangible analogue to the concept of “morphing surfaces.” The UnLAB propulsion concept itself relies on the fabrication of precisely engineered “asymmetric nanostructures” ; McKinnon’s expertise in the practical application of geometric rules to create complex physical structures is therefore directly applicable to the core manufacturing challenge of the project. Furthermore, the challenge of controlling a system that interacts with the quantum vacuum likely requires a computational paradigm beyond traditional digital logic. McKinnon’s documented interest in alternative modes of instruction and her project’s foundation in open-source, collaborative problem-solving align with the principles of “analog computation,” a non-digital method where physical phenomena are used to model and solve complex problems. Her partnership with Chase suggests that UnLAB’s strategic trajectory is a radical, cross-disciplinary fusion of next-generation physics (Chase) with next-generation materials and computation (McKinnon). A systematic search for any prior affiliations with the defense or intelligence communities for Catherine McKinnon yields a negative result. This absence is consistent with the operational security posture of a “gray track” entity, which seeks to minimize discoverable links to the traditional defense-industrial base.

The research programs at UnLAB and FPT, while both pursuing the goal of propellantless propulsion, represent distinct and divergent technological pathways. They are not an evolution of the FRC program’s plasma physics but are entirely new R&D vectors, indicative of a broader, more diversified government strategy. “Fluctuation Flow Propulsion” (UnLAB): The technical foundation for UnLAB’s research is detailed in the abstract for its NSF SBIR award (2432831). The project proposes to develop “a new type of propulsion based on the motive forces predicted to be generated from the interaction between quantum vacuum fluctuations and asymmetric nanostructures and potentials such are found in Resonant Tunneling Diodes”. This approach is a tangible, hardware-based attempt to engineer the quantum vacuum. It represents a significant evolution

2.3 Comparative Technical Assessment: Convergent Goals, Divergent Paths

from the highly theoretical concepts of the NAVAIR “Pais Effect” patents, moving from speculative field theory to an experimental, solid-state physics approach grounded in nanotechnology and materials science. Given that it is currently in a Phase I SBIR, its Technology Readiness Level (TRL) is assessed as TRL 2-3, where the technology concept has been formulated and experimental proof-of-concept is being initiated. “Ampere Tension Force” Metamaterials (FPT): FPT’s technology is based on a novel interpretation of classical electrodynamics. The core concept, detailed in its NSF and AFRL award abstracts, is the engineering of “metamaterial composite conductors” to amplify what Richard Banduric terms “unresolved longitudinal Ampere Tension forces” that arise from an electric current. The company claims to have developed a special graphene composite for this purpose. This approach is distinct from UnLAB’s focus on quantum vacuum physics. Assessment: The analysis concludes that these two technologies are competing, divergent pathways. UnLAB is pursuing a quantum-level phenomenon, while FPT is exploring a novel effect within classical electrodynamics. This is not a convergent evolution but a deliberate diversification of the U.S. research portfolio. The fact that both companies have received funding from the same NSF Program Director, Anna Brady-Estevez, and that their principals, Chase and Banduric, were placed in the same session at the government-sponsored “US Space Disruptors Day” conference, is dispositive evidence of a managed strategy. The government is not placing a single bet; it is cultivating a portfolio of high-risk options. Having secured a $1.25M AFRL Phase II award for a hardware prototype and a $1M NSF Phase II award, FPT’s technology is assessed as being at a more advanced TRL 3-4, where proof-of-concept has been validated and component-level testing is underway. The emergence of these two distinct, government-funded “gray tracks” reveals a sophisticated underlying strategy. The National Science Foundation, through its SBIR program, is acting as a strategic incubator for dual-use technologies that may be too speculative for formal DoD acquisition channels. This “gray zone” allows revolutionary concepts to be de-risked with government funds and legitimacy before a potential transition to more formal, and likely classified, defense programs. The partnership at UnLAB between a Skunk Works® physicist and a geometric artist further suggests a paradigm shift, indicating that the next breakthrough may arise not from a single discipline, but from a radical fusion of physics, materials science, and novel computational models. Table 2.1: Comparati ve Analysis of “Gray Track” Propulsion Technolog ies Technolog y Name

Key Enabling Materials/ Componen ts Asymmetric nanostructu

Sponsorin g Agency(s)

Principal Investigat or(s)

Core Physical Principle

Total Known Funding

Fluctuation Flow

Assessed TRL

Extraction of motive

Primary Entity

National Science

Charles Chase,

UnLAB LLC

~$275,000 2-3

Richard Banduric

Catherine McKinnon

Foundation (NSF)

DARPA, AFRL, NSF

Ampere Tension Force

Field Propulsion Technologi es Inc.

Table 2.1: Comparati ve Analysis of “Gray Track” Propulsion Technolog ies Propulsion

res, Resonant Tunneling Diodes (RTDs). Metamateri al composite conductors (graphene- based).

force from quantum vacuum fluctuations . Amplificatio n of longitudinal Ampere Tension forces in conductors.

The core of Jeffrey Epstein’s financial and legal machinery was managed by two key intermediaries: Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn. Following Epstein’s death, they were named as co-executors of his estate, responsible for administering a complex web of trusts, foundations, and limited liability companies designed for maximum opacity. Their roles, as detailed in court filings and investigative reports, extended far beyond conventional legal and financial advice. They were instrumental in structuring transactions to avoid regulatory scrutiny, managing the flow of funds used to sustain Epstein’s sex trafficking network, and directing payments to victims and associates. An investigation by the Senate Finance Committee revealed the immense scale of this financial network, identifying over 4,725 wire transfers totaling more than $1.08 billion between 2003 and 2019 involving Epstein and his key associates, including Indyke and Kahn. Critically, these records indicated transactions involving several now-sanctioned Russian banks, with a correlation noted between these wire transfers and the movement of women and girls. This demonstrates a financial architecture with connections to entities of significant counter-intelligence interest.

This section conducts a sensitive analysis of the financial and human networks associated with the late financier Jeffrey Epstein. The objective is to identify any non-public links to the defense and intelligence communities and to re-assess the 2006 “Confronting Gravity” workshop as a potential vector for talent-spotting or strategic influence within the advanced physics community.

Section III: Penetrating the Epstein Network Firewall: A Financial and Human Network Analysis (PIR-3)

3.1 Financial Intelligence Trace: Indyke and Kahn

>$2.8 Million

3-4

3.2 The “Confronting Gravity” Workshop Revisited: A Counter-Intelligence Honeytrap?

While a direct, open-source search for business associations between Indyke, Kahn, and known intelligence officers or defense contractors yields no dispositive results, the analysis must focus on the network’s structure and its intersections with the high-technology and scientific communities. Epstein actively cultivated a reputation as a philanthropist of science, providing funding to prominent institutions and researchers, such as the Harvard Human Genome Project through biologist George Church. This scientific philanthropy served as a vector for Epstein to build a network among elite scientists and the venture capitalists who fund their work, such as Boris Nikolic, a former science adviser to Bill Gates who was named as a successor executor in Epstein’s will. This network, which blended high finance, cutting-edge science, and a documented history of clandestine criminal activity, provided a fertile ground for second and third-degree links to the national security community. The financial infrastructure managed by Indyke and Kahn was sufficiently complex and opaque to be suitable for facilitating clandestine funding operations, though direct evidence of such activity remains a significant intelligence gap that cannot be penetrated with open-source methods alone.

In March 2006, Epstein’s J. Epstein Virgin Islands Foundation sponsored a high-profile physics workshop on St. Thomas titled “Confronting Gravity”. The event convened an elite group of approximately 22 of the world’s leading physicists to discuss fundamental questions in cosmology and quantum mechanics. The known participant list reads like a “who’s who” of theoretical physics, including Nobel laureates Gerard ‘t Hooft, David Gross, and Frank Wilczek, as well as renowned cosmologists Stephen Hawking, Alan Guth, and Kip Thorne. A primary intelligence requirement was to determine if this event served as a talent-spotting or recruitment effort that yielded any follow-on engagement with the U.S. defense or intelligence communities. A systematic and renewed search was conducted for any post-2006 contracts, grants, or formal advisory roles with the DoD, DARPA, IARPA, the CIA, or any of the identified “gray track” entities for all known attendees. This exhaustive search yielded a consistently negative result. There is no open-source evidence to suggest that any of these prominent physicists were subsequently recruited into or formally engaged by the clandestine U.S. propulsion programs. This negative finding is, in itself, highly significant. A direct talent recruitment effort targeting such a high-profile group would be expected to produce at least some discernible follow-on connections. The complete absence of such links suggests the workshop’s purpose was more subtle. An alternative and more plausible assessment is that the “Confronting Gravity” workshop functioned as a sophisticated “intellectual honeytrap”—a form of strategic deception. This assessment is grounded in the established U.S. counter-intelligence playbook. The U.S. has a documented history of using a public-facing “white” program—the NAVAIR “Pais Effect” patents—which is based on speculative physics, to create a public narrative and misdirect adversaries away from a more plausible, hardware-based “black” program (the Skunk Works® FRC). The 2006 workshop fits this model perfectly. The topics discussed, such as the fundamental nature of gravity and the role of the observer in quantum mechanics, are scientifically profound but represent a far more difficult, resource-intensive, and speculative path to a weaponizable technology than the plasma physics of the FRC program. By publicly associating a U.S.-linked entity (Epstein’s foundation) with these esoteric concepts, the event could have been designed to signal U.S. interest in a specific, high-profile, yet likely non-viable

4.1 An Updated Map of the Clandestine Ecosystem

Section IV: Strategic Synthesis and Outlook

This final section synthesizes the findings from all Primary Intelligence Requirements into a unified strategic assessment of the U.S. clandestine propulsion portfolio. It provides a comprehensive intelligence picture of the current industrial and research ecosystem and offers actionable recommendations for future intelligence collection efforts.

research direction. A foreign intelligence service observing this gathering of elite physicists might logically conclude that the U.S. was pursuing a breakthrough in these domains and be induced to launch its own costly “me too” program. This would divert valuable scientific talent and funding toward a theoretical dead end, degrading the adversary’s R&D efficiency while the true hardware programs remained protected. In this context, the lack of follow-on contracts is not evidence of failure, but rather positive evidence supporting the hypothesis of a successful strategic misdirection operation.

National Laboratory Support Node: Woodruff Scientific Inc. (S. Woodruff), providing specialized plasma physics R&D in support of the “black” track, funded by the DoE. The “White” Track continues to be represented by the NAVAIR “Pais Effect” patents (S. Pais, J. Sheehy), serving a primary function of strategic misdirection and information warfare. A critical finding is the first dispositive evidence of government-cultivated convergence between the “gray” tracks. The joint participation of Charles Chase (UnLAB) and Richard Banduric (FPT) at the “US Space Disruptors Day” conference, an event curated by their shared NSF program manager, Anna Brady-Estevez, indicates an active strategy of network-weaving designed to foster cross-pollination of ideas. Conversely, the complete and verifiable absence of professional links between the working-level personnel of the “black,” “white,” and “gray” tracks is not a lack of evidence; it is positive evidence of a professionally managed, compartmentalized security architecture designed to prevent a compromise in one area from cascading to others.

The multi-vector analysis conducted in this report allows for the construction of an updated and more comprehensive map of the U.S. clandestine advanced propulsion ecosystem. This map reveals a sophisticated, multi-layered architecture characterized by both deliberate convergence and strict compartmentalization. The “Black” Track remains the core, technologically mature effort, centered on the FRC/CFR platform. However, the industrial base for this track is now understood to be a bifurcated prime contractor model:

Flight Test & Evaluation: The Boeing Company, Phantom Works (Col. M. Giese). The “Gray” Track has expanded into a diversified portfolio of parallel, high-risk/high-reward ventures, incubated by government seed funding:
Platform Development: Lockheed Martin Skunk Works® (T. McGuire, G. Font).
Control System & Microelectronics: BAE Systems, Electronic Systems (Manassas,
Novel Electrodynamics / Metamaterials Vector: Field Propulsion Technologies Inc. (R.
Quantum Vacuum / Solid-State Vector: UnLAB Inc. & LLC (C. Chase, C. McKinnon),

Banduric), funded by DARPA, AFRL, and the NSF.

funded by the NSF.

VA).

Co-invent or

C. Chase (UnLAB)

S. Pais (NAVAIR)

G. Font (Skunk Works®)

M. Giese (Boeing/ USAF)

R. Banduric (FPT)

J. Sheehy (NAVAIR)

C. Chase NO LINK FOUND

NO LINK FOUND NO LINK FOUND

T. McGuire (Skunk Works®)

T. McGuire G. Font Co-invent

Table 4.1: Compreh ensive Personne l and Institutio nal Linkage Matrix

S. Woodruff (Woodruf f Sci.) NO LINK FOUND NO LINK FOUND NO LINK FOUND

The evidence synthesized in this report indicates that the DoD and its partner agencies are not pursuing a single, monolithic path to advanced propulsion. Instead, they are deliberately cultivating a diversified portfolio of parallel programs, each exploring a different and potentially competing physics pathway. This can be characterized as a sophisticated “barbell” investment strategy for managing risk in a domain of immense scientific uncertainty. At one end of the barbell is a significant, sustained investment in the most mature and technologically grounded vector: the plasma/fusion-based FRC program at Skunk Works®. This “black” track represents the safest bet for achieving an operational capability in the near to mid-term. At the other end of the barbell is a portfolio of smaller, lower-cost, but much higher-risk bets on the “gray” tracks, funded primarily through the SBIR program. These include UnLAB’s quantum vacuum approach and FPT’s novel electrodynamics/metamaterials research.

NO LINK FOUND NO LINK FOUND NO LINK FOUND NO LINK J. FOUND Sheehy 4.2 The DoD’s Diversified Portfolio Strategy: A “Barbell” Approach to Revolutionary Tech

S. NO LINK FOUND Woodruff M. Giese NO LINK FOUND S. Pais NO LINK FOUND NO LINK FOUND

Joint Conferenc e Presenter NO LINK FOUND NO LINK FOUND NO LINK FOUND NO LINK FOUND

NO LINK FOUND NO LINK FOUND Joint Conferenc e Presenter

NO LINK FOUND NO LINK FOUND NO LINK FOUND NO LINK FOUND

NO LINK FOUND NO LINK FOUND Program matic Link

NO LINK FOUND NO LINK FOUND NO LINK FOUND

NO LINK FOUND NO LINK FOUND

Program matic Link

R. Banduric

NO LINK FOUND

4.3 Recommendations for Future Intelligence Collection

The findings of this report lead to several specific, actionable recommendations for the ongoing monitoring of this evolving clandestine landscape, refining the original PIRs and identifying new intelligence gaps.

Priority 1 (Funding): Continue systematic, keyword-driven monitoring of the SBIR/STTR and SAM.gov award databases. The focus should be on any new Phase II or, critically, Phase III awards to UnLAB LLC and Field Propulsion Technologies Inc. A Phase III award, which involves non-SBIR government funding for procurement, would be a dispositive indicator that a technology has been deemed viable and is transitioning into a formal acquisition program.

This portfolio approach is a sophisticated risk management strategy. The immense technical challenges of any single approach—such as achieving stable plasma confinement in an FRC or proving a net force from the quantum vacuum—make it strategically prudent to fund multiple concepts in parallel. A breakthrough in any one of the “gray” tracks, which are pursued at relatively low cost, could potentially leapfrog the more mature “black” track and provide the United States with a decisive and unexpected technological advantage. The active curation of this ecosystem by government sponsors like the NSF, who foster collaboration between these disparate tracks, further enhances the probability of innovation.

Priority 4 (Financial Intelligence): The open-source analysis of the Epstein network has reached its limit. The documented involvement of sanctioned Russian banks and the opaque nature of the financial architecture managed by Indyke and Kahn represent a significant counter-intelligence risk and an unresolved intelligence gap. Specialized financial intelligence (FININT) assets should be tasked to conduct a non-public trace of the identified financial networks with the objective of identifying any direct or indirect links to foreign state-linked entities, intelligence services, or the U.S. defense industrial base.
Priority 2 (Human Capital): Establish a formal tracking system for the key personnel identified in the “gray” tracks (Chase, McKinnon, Banduric, Woodruff) and their senior technical staff. Utilize professional networking platforms, academic publications, and public records to monitor for any employment changes, particularly transitions to the prime contractors of the “black” track (Lockheed Martin, Boeing, BAE Systems). Such a transition would be a primary indicator of a successful technology transfer from research to a more mature development program.
Priority 3 (Network Convergence): Actively monitor the agendas, presenter lists, and proceedings of niche, government-adjacent conferences, particularly the “Advanced Propulsion & Energy (APE)” and “US Space Disruptors Day” series. These events are now confirmed as critical hubs for networking and legitimization within this community and serve as a primary venue for identifying new players and observing the convergence of previously disparate research tracks.

Radiation-hardened application specific integrated circuits (ASICs) - BAE Systems, https://www.baesystems.com/en/product/radiation-hardened-application-specific-integrated-circ uits—asics- 2. Microelectronics - BAE Systems, https://www.baesystems.com/en/product/microelectronics 3. BAE Systems - Virginia Microelectronics Consortium, https://vmecteam.org/bae-systems/ 4. BAE Systems Develops

Works cited

Next-generation Radiation-hardened Computer for Space - Choose Manassas, https://choosemanassas.org/1970/01/bae-systems-develops-next-generation-radiation-hardene d-computer-for-space/ 5. BAE Systems to advance cutting-edge integrated circuit technology for the space industry, https://www.baesystems.com/en/article/bae-systems-to-advance-cutting-edge-integrated-circuit- technology-for-the-space-industry 6. Radiation Hardened (Rad Hard) Electronics - BAE Systems, https://www.baesystems.com/en/product/radiation-hardened-electronics 7. asics - BAE Systems, https://www.baesystems.com/dam/jcr:d0eeefd7-6004-4a76-b758-0a461e76a25a 8. GPS III satellite launches with RAD750 single board computers - BAE Systems, https://www.baesystems.com/en/article/gps-iii-satellite-launches-with-rad750—single-board-com puters 9. BAE Systems delivers first radiation-hardened RAD5545® radios, https://www.baesystems.com/en/article/bae-systems-delivers-first-radiation-hardened-rad5545-r adios 10. Edwards Air Force Base - Home, https://www.edwards.af.mil/ 11. Edwards Air Force Base - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwards_Air_Force_Base 12. Base Guide - Mission > Edwards Air Force Base > Display, https://www.edwards.af.mil/About/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/393916/base-guide-mission/ 13. Edwards AFB | Base Overview & Info | MilitaryINSTALLATIONS, https://installations.militaryonesource.mil/in-depth-overview/edwards-afb 14. Matthew P. Giese > Edwards Air Force Base > Display, https://www.edwards.af.mil/About/Biographies/Display/Article/3903802/matthew-p-giese/ 15. Col. Matthew P. Giese - Edwards Air Force Base, https://www.edwards.af.mil/News/Photos/igphoto/2003542639/ 16. [email protected] | Topics, https://groups.io/g/NAMAR/topics?page=129&after=1613662124509051319 17. What It’s Like To Fly The F-15EX According To A Boeing Test Pilot - The War Zone, https://www.twz.com/sponsored-content/what-its-like-to-fly-the-f-15ex-according-to-a-boeing-test -pilot 18. Boeing Awards 777X Remote Electronic Units - BAE Systems, https://www.baesystems.com/en/article/boeing-awards-777x-remote-electronic-units 19. BAE Systems wins Boeing contract - IMechE, https://www.imeche.org/news/news-article/bae-systems-wins-boeing-contract 20. EPAWSS testing readies F-15 for future > Air Force Materiel Command > Article Display, https://www.afmc.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/2150567/epawss-testing-readies-f-15-for-fut ure/ 21. Eagle Passive Active Warning Survivability System (EPAWSS) - BAE Systems, https://www.baesystems.com/en/product/eagle-passive-active-warning-survivability-system-epa wss 22. EW testing progresses on F-15 EPAWSS upgrade - Military Embedded Systems, https://militaryembedded.com/avionics/computers/ew-testing-progresses-on-f-15-epawss-upgra de 23. F-15 Eagle Passive Active Warning Survivability System (EPAWSS) - Director Operational Test and Evaluation, https://www.dote.osd.mil/Portals/97/pub/reports/FY2020/af/2020f15epawss.pdf?ver=T34-pZDko SfWv4oXmRY6Aw== 24. Posh Open Source Hardware - DARPA, https://www.darpa.mil/program/posh-open-source-hardware 25. DARPA Drops $35 Million on “Posh Open Source Hardware” Project - Linux.com, https://www.linux.com/topic/embedded-iot/darpa-drops-35-million-posh-open-source-hardware-p roject/ 26. Research Teams Selected to Lower Barriers to Modern System-on-Chip Design Announced, https://www.darpa.mil/news/2018/system-on-chip-design 27. RESOURCE GUIDE P 46 - OpenSystems Media, http://pdf.cloud.opensystemsmedia.com/emag/MES_2018_Sept18RG+LINKS.pdf 28. How DARPA is tackling long-term microelectronics challenges - C4ISRNet, https://www.c4isrnet.com/battlefield-tech/2023/09/08/how-darpa-is-tackling-long-term-microelect

ronics-challenges/ 29. Unlab Inc - Nonprofit Explorer - ProPublica, https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/832430934 30. Unlab Profile - HigherGov, https://www.highergov.com/awardee/unlab-llc-627414950/ 31. Awardees phase 1 details - NSF SBIR, https://seedfund.nsf.gov/awardees/phase-1/details/ 32. SBIR Phase I: Fluctuation Flow Propulsion - National Science Foundation, https://nsf.elsevierpure.com/en/projects/sbir-phasefluctuation-flow-propulsion 33. Field Propulsion Technologies 2025 Company Profile: Valuation, Funding & Investors, https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/522856-81 34. Field Propulsion Technologies - HigherGov, https://www.highergov.com/awardee/field-propulsion-technologies-inc-12497296/ 35. Richard Banduric - Field Propulsion Technologies Inc - Invstor.com, https://www.invstor.com/users/richard-banduric 36. SBIR Phase I: Advanced Propellant-less propulsion system for spacecraft based on the Unresolved Longitudinal Ampere Tension Forces in Conductors - National Science Foundation, https://nsf.elsevierpure.com/en/projects/sbir-phase-advanced-propellant-less-propulsion-system -for-spacecr 37. Awardees phase 2 details | NSF SBIR, https://seedfund.nsf.gov/awardees/phase-2/details/ 38. Award | SBIR, https://www.sbir.gov/awards/197515 39. field propulsion technonogies inc. - Awardees phase 2 details | NSF SBIR, https://seedfund.nsf.gov/awardees/phase-2/details/?company=field-propulsion-technonogies-inc 40. Catharine A. MacKinnon - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catharine_A._MacKinnon 41. Catharine MacKinnon | U-M LSA International Institute - University of Michigan, https://ii.umich.edu/ii/people/all/c/camtwo.html 42. en.wikipedia.org, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catharine_A._MacKinnon#:~:text=Catharine%20Alice%20MacKinn on%20(born%20October,Law%20at%20Harvard%20Law%20School. 43. Catharine A. MacKinnon | Biography, Books, Only Words, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State, & Facts | Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Catharine-A-MacKinnon 44. CONTEMPORARY GEOMETRIC BEADWORK | an open source …, https://beadmobile.wordpress.com/ 45. CONTEMPORARY GEOMETRIC BEADWORK - RSSing.com, https://beadwork54.rssing.com/chan-13426254/all_p1.html 46. basics.pdf - Contemporary Geometric Beadwork, https://beadmobile.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/basics.pdf 47. Volume II: An Explorer’s Guide - Contemporary Geometric Beadwork, https://beadmobile.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/cgb-volume-ii-basics-section-by-kate-mckinnon. pdf 48. Interview with Kate McKinnon of Contemporary Geometric Beadwork - YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3D-jBaH6Po 49. Field Propulsion Technologies Inc. - Firm | SBIR, https://www.sbir.gov/portfolio/1531055 50. Ghislaine Maxwell - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghislaine_Maxwell 51. KATLYN DOE, Plaintiff, vs. DARREN K. INDYKE AND RICHARD D, https://assets.bwbx.io/documents/users/iqjWHBFdfxIU/rtxb6Zlw5skM/v0 52. Jeffrey Epstein transferred $578 million to trust days before suicide - InvestmentNews, https://www.investmentnews.com/ria-news/jeffrey-epstein-transferred-578-million-to-trust-days-b efore-suicide/80952 53. RICHARD D. KAHN, in his capacity as The Government ofthe United States Virgin Is, https://www.vicourts.org/workspaces/One.aspx?objectId=16911884&contextId=15978985 54. Jeffrey Epstein And The Associates Who Turned Into Executors - Apple Podcasts, https://podcasts.apple.com/my/podcast/jeffrey-epstein-and-the-associates-who-turned/id157575 3383?i=1000720544307&l=ms 55. ghislaine maxwell - Judiciary of the US Virgin Islands, https://www.vicourts.org/workspaces/One.aspx?objectId=16556248&contextId=9784229 56. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS,

https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=17104534 57. Jane Doe 3 v. Indyke et al, No. 1:2024cv02192 - Document 38 (S.D.N.Y. 2024) - Justia Law, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-york/nysdce/1:2024cv02192/618125/38/ 58. July 21, 2025 The Honorable Pam Bondi Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. - Senate Finance Committee, https://www.finance.senate.gov/download/wyden-letter-to-doj_-follow-the-money-on-jeffrey-epst ein-7-21-25pdf 59. World’s Top Physicists to Meet in the Virgin Islands | St. Thomas …, https://stthomassource.com/content/2006/03/15/worlds-top-physicists-meet-virgin-islands/ 60. Physicists Debate Gravity at St. Thomas Symposium | St. Thomas …, https://stthomassource.com/content/2006/03/17/physicists-debate-gravity-st-thomas-symposium / 61. Funding Breakthrough Research: Promises and Challenges of the “ARPA Model”: Innovation Policy and the Economy - The University of Chicago Press: Journals, https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/699933 62. Artificial Intelligence and National Security - Belfer Center, https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/pantheon_files/files/publication/AI%20NatSec%20 -%20final.pdf 63. Prof. dr. G. (Gerard) ‘t Hooft - Utrecht University, https://www.uu.nl/staff/GtHooft 64. Stephen Hawking (1942-2018) - Jacobin, https://jacobin.com/2018/03/stephen-hawking-obituary-als-nhs-bds 65. Gerard ‘t Hooft - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerard_%27t_Hooft 66. Remembering Stephen Hawking | Arts & Sciences Magazine | Johns Hopkins University, https://magazine.krieger.jhu.edu/spring-2019-v16n2/remembering-stephen-hawking/ 67. Not Even Wrong | Page 68 - Columbia Math Department, https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?height=xbesdnlqmdf&paged=68 68. Alan H. Guth ‘69, PhD ‘72 - MIT Physics, https://physics.mit.edu/faculty/alan-guth/